<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Taylor Holmes inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylorholmes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylorholmes.com</link>
	<description>that I may know the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pixelated Jealousy by simon t.</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/04/08/pixelated-jealousy/comment-page-1/#comment-14115</link>
		<dc:creator>simon t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=465#comment-14115</guid>
		<description>I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou8vRWTSsJo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; should be it. Thanks, it&#039;s really cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou8vRWTSsJo" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou8vRWTSsJo&amp;referer=');">this</a> should be it. Thanks, it&#8217;s really cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memento Explained by John</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/28/memento-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14100</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=426#comment-14100</guid>
		<description>This may be a bit far-fetched... but maybe the &quot;I did it&quot; is in fact insinuating that Leonard himself (for whatever reason) killed his own wife. As was the case with Sammy, perhaps his problem was not physical at all, instead perhaps it was mental. We see a similar situation in the movie &quot;Shutter Island&quot; in which Leonardo DiCaprio kills his own wife and thus has memory loss and plays an investigative game (similar to what Lenny does). Also, the parallel between the names Lenny and Sammy strike me as interesting. The rhyming in these names perhaps represents a parallel between the two where both killed their wives, just by different means. Lenny creates the Sammy story so that he would not remember how he had actually killed his wife. Thus, he may have been put on trial, put in a home for mental treatment and imagines everything in his own mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a bit far-fetched&#8230; but maybe the &#8220;I did it&#8221; is in fact insinuating that Leonard himself (for whatever reason) killed his own wife. As was the case with Sammy, perhaps his problem was not physical at all, instead perhaps it was mental. We see a similar situation in the movie &#8220;Shutter Island&#8221; in which Leonardo DiCaprio kills his own wife and thus has memory loss and plays an investigative game (similar to what Lenny does). Also, the parallel between the names Lenny and Sammy strike me as interesting. The rhyming in these names perhaps represents a parallel between the two where both killed their wives, just by different means. Lenny creates the Sammy story so that he would not remember how he had actually killed his wife. Thus, he may have been put on trial, put in a home for mental treatment and imagines everything in his own mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Troubling Inception Questions by Dan Suttin</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/08/11/10-inception-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-14045</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Suttin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=553#comment-14045</guid>
		<description>Besides the main inception of the idea into Fischer, there is also a kind of inception made into Cobb in that he was made free of his guilt.  Miles gave Cobb the help of Ariadne who was not only a better architect than he, but also a better dream navigator who, unbeknownst to Cobb, I believe had already been trained in dreaming by Miles and had, I think, before they went on their trip, been in communication with Miles about the mission and about Cobb’s inner struggles.  Perhaps she already knew from Miles that Cobb had not murdered Mal, so she didn’t need to ask him if he had.  Near the end, she could say that, “He’ll be all right,” because she saw he had been freed from all his demons, and expected that he would be able to find and bring back Saito.  Saito had “died” in a dream as opposed to Mal who had died in top level reality and so she could not be brought back; Saito just needed to remember.  I think Miles gave Cobb the assistance of Ariadne not only to help accomplish the mission on behalf of Saito, so that Cobb could return to the States, but also to facilitate the resolution of Cobb’s personal issues.  Miles, knowing from Ariadne, the time of the flight, knew to be at the airport to meet Cobb in the final scene.  I think Miles is Mal’s father rather than Cobb’s. The top stops spinning; Cobb is truly home.
 
Arthur: [Getting out of the water after the kicks] What happened? 
Ariadne: Cobb stayed. 
Arthur: With Mal? 
Ariadne: No, to find Saito. 
Arthur: He&#039;ll be lost. 
Ariadne: No, he&#039;ll be all right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the main inception of the idea into Fischer, there is also a kind of inception made into Cobb in that he was made free of his guilt.  Miles gave Cobb the help of Ariadne who was not only a better architect than he, but also a better dream navigator who, unbeknownst to Cobb, I believe had already been trained in dreaming by Miles and had, I think, before they went on their trip, been in communication with Miles about the mission and about Cobb’s inner struggles.  Perhaps she already knew from Miles that Cobb had not murdered Mal, so she didn’t need to ask him if he had.  Near the end, she could say that, “He’ll be all right,” because she saw he had been freed from all his demons, and expected that he would be able to find and bring back Saito.  Saito had “died” in a dream as opposed to Mal who had died in top level reality and so she could not be brought back; Saito just needed to remember.  I think Miles gave Cobb the assistance of Ariadne not only to help accomplish the mission on behalf of Saito, so that Cobb could return to the States, but also to facilitate the resolution of Cobb’s personal issues.  Miles, knowing from Ariadne, the time of the flight, knew to be at the airport to meet Cobb in the final scene.  I think Miles is Mal’s father rather than Cobb’s. The top stops spinning; Cobb is truly home.</p>
<p>Arthur: [Getting out of the water after the kicks] What happened?<br />
Ariadne: Cobb stayed.<br />
Arthur: With Mal?<br />
Ariadne: No, to find Saito.<br />
Arthur: He&#8217;ll be lost.<br />
Ariadne: No, he&#8217;ll be all right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by troy M</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>troy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>Angier&#039;s machine did work.
You need to read the book.
Sorry, you tricked yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angier&#8217;s machine did work.<br />
You need to read the book.<br />
Sorry, you tricked yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Dream Layers of Inception by Taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/20/7-layers-of-inception/comment-page-1/#comment-14037</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=486#comment-14037</guid>
		<description>Hahahaha!!  SEO... you rock!
I don&#039;t even know what you said!  But I love it.  If you would like to point out the &quot;jumps in logic&quot; I&#039;d be happy to shore them up - or clarify.  I probably need to rewrite the blog from top to bottom to account for some of the comments in this thread.  And to change some of the key assumptions.  

I think I really was only positing one thing throughout this entire blog - and that is, Mal was right.  Cobb is dreaming actually dreaming.  All the rest is semantics.  Are there actually 7 layers?  No probably not... because Limbo isn&#039;t a layer.    And also because Cobb&#039;s Limbo and Saito&#039;s Limbo should be the same.  But seven is so much snappier concept to sell than 5.  heheh.  It is the perfect number.  Just saying.

Thanks for writing SEO!
Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahaha!!  SEO&#8230; you rock!<br />
I don&#8217;t even know what you said!  But I love it.  If you would like to point out the &#8220;jumps in logic&#8221; I&#8217;d be happy to shore them up &#8211; or clarify.  I probably need to rewrite the blog from top to bottom to account for some of the comments in this thread.  And to change some of the key assumptions.  </p>
<p>I think I really was only positing one thing throughout this entire blog &#8211; and that is, Mal was right.  Cobb is dreaming actually dreaming.  All the rest is semantics.  Are there actually 7 layers?  No probably not&#8230; because Limbo isn&#8217;t a layer.    And also because Cobb&#8217;s Limbo and Saito&#8217;s Limbo should be the same.  But seven is so much snappier concept to sell than 5.  heheh.  It is the perfect number.  Just saying.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing SEO!<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Dream Layers of Inception by seo</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/20/7-layers-of-inception/comment-page-1/#comment-14033</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=486#comment-14033</guid>
		<description>The very crux of your writing whilst appearing agreeable originally, did not really sit properly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I still have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do well to help fill in all those gaps. In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I would undoubtedly end up being impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very crux of your writing whilst appearing agreeable originally, did not really sit properly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I still have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do well to help fill in all those gaps. In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I would undoubtedly end up being impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by MynamesRAnonymous</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14010</link>
		<dc:creator>MynamesRAnonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-14010</guid>
		<description>I could mention more trickery on screen but if I may just add two more important things : When Angier shot Alfred Borden`s two fingers off ,that was part of the trickery.Fallon who scouted the crowd for volunteers specifically chose the disguised Angier.They needed to distinguish the individuality of Alfred`s transporting man as a man with only 3 fingers on the one hand.Olivia noted that to Angier.

When Fallon got trapped in the box by Cutter and Angier  ,he immediately shot out through the box,to warn Angier he has  a gun.Angier therefor could not open the box at will and perhaps pull his disguise off.It fooled Angier and bought Alfred`s true trick some time.This too was planned as Alfred lead them in the chase scene.

Angier`s quest for vengeance got substituted with seeking fame and to better Alfred.Yet he was the one being tricked all the time.The sacrifices he made are nothing compared to Alfred loosing his brother or perhaps a clone friend .But it did make him rich.Try and watch the film again with these opinions I stated ; magicians tricking a man to lose his wife (she would get the will if he should die rich)so they took her out of the picture first.With the Transporting man they lead him to feel not only jealous but vengeful.They kept leading him even after a while he thought he got the upper hand and lead Alfred to a set up.They needed him to draw in crowds many times with an awesome trick.Why does Angier close his eyes when he allows people to inspect his device.He wants to trick Alfred into inspecting it and the under stage to set him up.Perhaps Alfred wanted to be set up maybe not.When he read Angier`s notes in prison ,Angiers speaks to him directly.
Why does Alfred/Fallon so easily reveal his tricks to Angier but not the reason for the knot?
The knot was a murder, to con Angier onto to this path.And in the end they made money from a half-assed unoriginal &#039;magician&#039;.
If Fallon was a clone then Alfred iss a better magician than Angier ever could be.It was in his nature to work with his clone (himself) but Angier nor his 100 clones could trust each other or work together.
Angier even though he was the conned victim,deserved true death in the end like Alfred took responsibility for  Sarah Borden`s death (Fallon`s wife),never for Julia (Angier`s wife).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could mention more trickery on screen but if I may just add two more important things : When Angier shot Alfred Borden`s two fingers off ,that was part of the trickery.Fallon who scouted the crowd for volunteers specifically chose the disguised Angier.They needed to distinguish the individuality of Alfred`s transporting man as a man with only 3 fingers on the one hand.Olivia noted that to Angier.</p>
<p>When Fallon got trapped in the box by Cutter and Angier  ,he immediately shot out through the box,to warn Angier he has  a gun.Angier therefor could not open the box at will and perhaps pull his disguise off.It fooled Angier and bought Alfred`s true trick some time.This too was planned as Alfred lead them in the chase scene.</p>
<p>Angier`s quest for vengeance got substituted with seeking fame and to better Alfred.Yet he was the one being tricked all the time.The sacrifices he made are nothing compared to Alfred loosing his brother or perhaps a clone friend .But it did make him rich.Try and watch the film again with these opinions I stated ; magicians tricking a man to lose his wife (she would get the will if he should die rich)so they took her out of the picture first.With the Transporting man they lead him to feel not only jealous but vengeful.They kept leading him even after a while he thought he got the upper hand and lead Alfred to a set up.They needed him to draw in crowds many times with an awesome trick.Why does Angier close his eyes when he allows people to inspect his device.He wants to trick Alfred into inspecting it and the under stage to set him up.Perhaps Alfred wanted to be set up maybe not.When he read Angier`s notes in prison ,Angiers speaks to him directly.<br />
Why does Alfred/Fallon so easily reveal his tricks to Angier but not the reason for the knot?<br />
The knot was a murder, to con Angier onto to this path.And in the end they made money from a half-assed unoriginal &#8216;magician&#8217;.<br />
If Fallon was a clone then Alfred iss a better magician than Angier ever could be.It was in his nature to work with his clone (himself) but Angier nor his 100 clones could trust each other or work together.<br />
Angier even though he was the conned victim,deserved true death in the end like Alfred took responsibility for  Sarah Borden`s death (Fallon`s wife),never for Julia (Angier`s wife).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by MynamesRAnonymous</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14009</link>
		<dc:creator>MynamesRAnonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-14009</guid>
		<description>I appreciate every ones theory and yet you are all Robert Angier searching like him for the answers from his point of view.Taylor Holmes is 98 % percent right on the money except for the cloning part not being real.But even then the real answer is not revealed.
Notice Alfred Borden and Robert Angier are mostly mentioned on their names beginning with an A. The  names starting with A  is followed by a &#039;n&#039; and the other one a &#039;l&#039;  . &#039;m&#039; is separating the two; MAGIC or MONEY.Cutter is only know by that name.

What if this film is more about money than magic.From the very start before all the conflict started between two magicians,you were being fooled or should I  say conned.It was all part of The Pledge.
Consider this.A father and his two identical sons,help rich people do magic for fame.They aren`t very well of because of their clothes and the way they speak.
A well of man joins this &#039;family business&#039;.He wants to learn magic.The father and two sons know they can make a fortune off him.Angier has good showman-ship,he knows the trade.
The Turn ; they kill his wife.Yes I said it.It was no accident.3 things happen now.We see Angier enraged and a lets be honest here , at an affordable funeral.
Why kill his wife you ask?To control the will.Or to lead Angier onto a path of not only revenge but competition only to be conned later.
Alfred starts a new act that plants the idea of revenge in Angier`s mind ; The transported man.
He meets Cutter (the father) who proposes an idea ;He can be better he has showman ship. He meets an assistant (Olivia )who is in on the act from the start.Yes she has been in love with Alfred from the start even before they met for the first time.She conveniently takes Angier to a double of himself or perhaps a clone.They constantly lead Angier away from the question, what knot was used and more to the trick of the transported man.As Angier follows Alfred.Alfred leads him and Fallon  who follows hAngier down a certain path.Fallon falls through ,gets trapped by Cutter and Angier and held ransom for the the key code of the trick found in the notebook Alfred wanted .Bit weird that Alfred did the leading ?.He exchanges the key code but on purpose.When he told his wife he lost something precious was it the secret of his trick or perhaps Fallon his brother or maybe his clone.Bernard Fallon.The first letter followed by the a in Fallon is &#039; L &#039; again. Bernard is also the second letter to Alfred maybe meaning that he is the younger twin or the second original clone.
I`m not certain whether Angier knew that Borden was conning him and there for did a trick of his own and even revealed in his diary that he knew that Alfred Borden would play slip up and investigate.The thing is Angier killed many of himselfs leaving the question of where to all the clones go.Beckoning Borden to consider that and investigate.Angier staged his fake death to get back at Borden.But he still persist on knowing the truth of Alfred Bordens trick.He hit`s him where it hits hardest,taking his daughter.
The final part of the turn : Borden is hanged to death.
Cutter nods to Fallon/Borden after his conversation with Angier as he walks out of the theater.
The Prestige.Borden/Fallon  appears or Prestiges only to Angier revealing the answer to him to his death.The whole world except Cutter and Alfreds daughter is still in The TURN phase forever.
Even when he explained almost everything and the audience is think they figured out the prestige the Narrator says ,....we want to be fooled. is true.
Alfred wanted to be caught and hanged for the murder of Angier.They needed for him to make lots of money then stop doing magic to hide his identity (Lord Coltrane) notice the C and play of the alphabetical letter through out the films characters.
Alfred finally killed the last and only version of Angier after they originally killed his wife.Conning him out of all his money he made for them.That`s what I thought happened anyway because Alfred meets with Cutter even though he was supposed to be on Angier`s side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate every ones theory and yet you are all Robert Angier searching like him for the answers from his point of view.Taylor Holmes is 98 % percent right on the money except for the cloning part not being real.But even then the real answer is not revealed.<br />
Notice Alfred Borden and Robert Angier are mostly mentioned on their names beginning with an A. The  names starting with A  is followed by a &#8216;n&#8217; and the other one a &#8216;l&#8217;  . &#8216;m&#8217; is separating the two; MAGIC or MONEY.Cutter is only know by that name.</p>
<p>What if this film is more about money than magic.From the very start before all the conflict started between two magicians,you were being fooled or should I  say conned.It was all part of The Pledge.<br />
Consider this.A father and his two identical sons,help rich people do magic for fame.They aren`t very well of because of their clothes and the way they speak.<br />
A well of man joins this &#8216;family business&#8217;.He wants to learn magic.The father and two sons know they can make a fortune off him.Angier has good showman-ship,he knows the trade.<br />
The Turn ; they kill his wife.Yes I said it.It was no accident.3 things happen now.We see Angier enraged and a lets be honest here , at an affordable funeral.<br />
Why kill his wife you ask?To control the will.Or to lead Angier onto a path of not only revenge but competition only to be conned later.<br />
Alfred starts a new act that plants the idea of revenge in Angier`s mind ; The transported man.<br />
He meets Cutter (the father) who proposes an idea ;He can be better he has showman ship. He meets an assistant (Olivia )who is in on the act from the start.Yes she has been in love with Alfred from the start even before they met for the first time.She conveniently takes Angier to a double of himself or perhaps a clone.They constantly lead Angier away from the question, what knot was used and more to the trick of the transported man.As Angier follows Alfred.Alfred leads him and Fallon  who follows hAngier down a certain path.Fallon falls through ,gets trapped by Cutter and Angier and held ransom for the the key code of the trick found in the notebook Alfred wanted .Bit weird that Alfred did the leading ?.He exchanges the key code but on purpose.When he told his wife he lost something precious was it the secret of his trick or perhaps Fallon his brother or maybe his clone.Bernard Fallon.The first letter followed by the a in Fallon is &#8216; L &#8216; again. Bernard is also the second letter to Alfred maybe meaning that he is the younger twin or the second original clone.<br />
I`m not certain whether Angier knew that Borden was conning him and there for did a trick of his own and even revealed in his diary that he knew that Alfred Borden would play slip up and investigate.The thing is Angier killed many of himselfs leaving the question of where to all the clones go.Beckoning Borden to consider that and investigate.Angier staged his fake death to get back at Borden.But he still persist on knowing the truth of Alfred Bordens trick.He hit`s him where it hits hardest,taking his daughter.<br />
The final part of the turn : Borden is hanged to death.<br />
Cutter nods to Fallon/Borden after his conversation with Angier as he walks out of the theater.<br />
The Prestige.Borden/Fallon  appears or Prestiges only to Angier revealing the answer to him to his death.The whole world except Cutter and Alfreds daughter is still in The TURN phase forever.<br />
Even when he explained almost everything and the audience is think they figured out the prestige the Narrator says ,&#8230;.we want to be fooled. is true.<br />
Alfred wanted to be caught and hanged for the murder of Angier.They needed for him to make lots of money then stop doing magic to hide his identity (Lord Coltrane) notice the C and play of the alphabetical letter through out the films characters.<br />
Alfred finally killed the last and only version of Angier after they originally killed his wife.Conning him out of all his money he made for them.That`s what I thought happened anyway because Alfred meets with Cutter even though he was supposed to be on Angier`s side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memento Explained by Taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/28/memento-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14004</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=426#comment-14004</guid>
		<description>I agree Michele - I have been lurking here for a while, longer than I remember... and have just had a lot of fun every time another person drops by and throws their two cents out there.  Memento is such an epicly wide open move and so disjointedly foreign that it really can go any which way.  

I didn&#039;t realize the comments plugin jacked up the readability of the older comments.  Need to go fix that pronto.  Regardless, would love to hear your comments after you&#039;ve rewatched it again!

Until then,
Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Michele &#8211; I have been lurking here for a while, longer than I remember&#8230; and have just had a lot of fun every time another person drops by and throws their two cents out there.  Memento is such an epicly wide open move and so disjointedly foreign that it really can go any which way.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realize the comments plugin jacked up the readability of the older comments.  Need to go fix that pronto.  Regardless, would love to hear your comments after you&#8217;ve rewatched it again!</p>
<p>Until then,<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memento Explained by Michele</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/28/memento-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-14001</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=426#comment-14001</guid>
		<description>I, for one, am very appreciative of the many thoughts and opinions being shared here. I am going to re-watch Memento and go from there. Amazing film in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, am very appreciative of the many thoughts and opinions being shared here. I am going to re-watch Memento and go from there. Amazing film in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

