<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Taylor Holmes inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylorholmes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylorholmes.com</link>
	<description>Christian non-profit errata &#38; ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Dream Layers of Inception by Jack</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/20/7-layers-of-inception/comment-page-2/#comment-10010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=486#comment-10010</guid>
		<description>Oh, and great article by the way :)

Really opened my eyes to some stuff I wouldn&#039;t have otherwise seen. Does anyone think the DVD Special Features will explain stuff? Or do ya think Nolan will leave it ambiguous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and great article by the way <img src='http://taylorholmes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Really opened my eyes to some stuff I wouldn&#8217;t have otherwise seen. Does anyone think the DVD Special Features will explain stuff? Or do ya think Nolan will leave it ambiguous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Dream Layers of Inception by Jack</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/20/7-layers-of-inception/comment-page-2/#comment-10009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=486#comment-10009</guid>
		<description>Check this out!
Amazing article on Inception and other similar films!

http://cinematicjackass.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/on-dreams-and-dreams-captured-on-film/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out!<br />
Amazing article on Inception and other similar films!</p>
<p><a href="http://cinematicjackass.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/on-dreams-and-dreams-captured-on-film/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cinematicjackass.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/on-dreams-and-dreams-captured-on-film/?referer=');">http://cinematicjackass.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/on-dreams-and-dreams-captured-on-film/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by Adeeb Wahab</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>Adeeb Wahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>I think something which may prove that Tesla was planning this con could be the sudden appearance of the mysterious saboteurs. Angiers doesn&#039;t know who they are until the hotel manager &quot;lets&quot; him on the secret that the men have been sent by Thomas Edison. The sabotage provided a convenient excuse for Mr.Tesla to flee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think something which may prove that Tesla was planning this con could be the sudden appearance of the mysterious saboteurs. Angiers doesn&#8217;t know who they are until the hotel manager &#8220;lets&#8221; him on the secret that the men have been sent by Thomas Edison. The sabotage provided a convenient excuse for Mr.Tesla to flee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memento Explained by Ethan</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/07/28/memento-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-10003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=426#comment-10003</guid>
		<description>I like Josh&#039;s theory. I&#039;m having trouble making sense of Natalie&#039;s role in the movie though. When he pulls up in Jimmy&#039;s car, she mistook him for Jimmy. Then again in the bar when he explains the note on the coaster and says he found it in his pocket she sarcastically says &quot;yeah, your pocket.&quot; She clearly must know that he had a hand in Jimmy&#039;s death, but she never says anything. Also, Teddy had been in the bar talking to her about Lenny, and when she gave Lenny the information on John Gammel she said she had seen him in the bar before, so she obviously made that connection. Does she know its Teddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Josh&#8217;s theory. I&#8217;m having trouble making sense of Natalie&#8217;s role in the movie though. When he pulls up in Jimmy&#8217;s car, she mistook him for Jimmy. Then again in the bar when he explains the note on the coaster and says he found it in his pocket she sarcastically says &#8220;yeah, your pocket.&#8221; She clearly must know that he had a hand in Jimmy&#8217;s death, but she never says anything. Also, Teddy had been in the bar talking to her about Lenny, and when she gave Lenny the information on John Gammel she said she had seen him in the bar before, so she obviously made that connection. Does she know its Teddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Totems Explanation by Aru</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/08/02/inception-totems-explanation/comment-page-2/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Aru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=522#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>hey...
first of all, i&#039;m sorry for my poor english. I&#039;m from Brasil, so I hope you all understand...

well... we actually see the bishop working. It always fall &quot;smiling&quot; to you because of the weight difference.

Cobb is wearing the wedding ring on the dreams, but in the real world/1st dream he isn&#039;t

and I don&#039;t remember ever seeing the top falling. on the first scene that it appears, Arthur enters the room, and Cobb hide the top before it falls... in other scene, he is so nervous that he drops the top instead of making it spin... but there&#039;s always somebody or something that don&#039;t let us see if the top will stop or not...

and if it really is a dream, the first inception was probably made on Cobb...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey&#8230;<br />
first of all, i&#8217;m sorry for my poor english. I&#8217;m from Brasil, so I hope you all understand&#8230;</p>
<p>well&#8230; we actually see the bishop working. It always fall &#8220;smiling&#8221; to you because of the weight difference.</p>
<p>Cobb is wearing the wedding ring on the dreams, but in the real world/1st dream he isn&#8217;t</p>
<p>and I don&#8217;t remember ever seeing the top falling. on the first scene that it appears, Arthur enters the room, and Cobb hide the top before it falls&#8230; in other scene, he is so nervous that he drops the top instead of making it spin&#8230; but there&#8217;s always somebody or something that don&#8217;t let us see if the top will stop or not&#8230;</p>
<p>and if it really is a dream, the first inception was probably made on Cobb&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Totems Explanation by taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/08/02/inception-totems-explanation/comment-page-2/#comment-10000</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=522#comment-10000</guid>
		<description>Andreas, 
Great questions all.  I&#039;ll try and speak to each of your points in my response.  Not because I would like you convinced one way or another but because from the &quot;its all a dream&quot; perspective I think there are answers.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Mal’s place of death. Wouldn’t be easier and more logical to stand on the window of their room?&lt;/blockquote&gt;After writing so much with so many people about this movie I can&#039;t remember if I made this point in my original 7 Layers post or not.  But this one scene was a BIG piece of evidence that it was in fact a dream.  The same building next door?  The same room with the same billowing curtains?  Sure, she could have booked a room in the EXACT opposite room in the other building... but really?  The dream-like qualities of this experience are way way too coincidental for me.  
&lt;blockquote&gt;The only totem we see at work throughout the movie (assuming that Eame’s chip is not a totem) is Cobb’s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Some people have posited that Saito and Yusuf didn&#039;t need totems as they were just visitors and wouldn&#039;t have normally come along for the ride.  But everyone MIGHT have had one?  We just haven&#039;t been shown what they are if they do.  Not sure, we only know what Nolan has shown us.  The one that totally baffles me is Cobbe.  Just makes zero since that he wouldn&#039;t have one of his own.  (At this I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get 42 people saying that his ring is his totem.  But I&#039;ll reiterate that I don&#039;t believe that &quot;nothing&quot; could be a totem.  NOTHING that turns into a ring when in dream.)
&lt;blockquote&gt;So accepting that we are actually watching a dream, it has to be a really really huge one and the characters are set apart from each other.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  This is a really good point.  I hadn&#039;t specifically thought of this before.  

I personally maintain that the whole concept of the dream sharing technology is a dream.  That the architecting of dreams is a dream.  That the whole Cobol run around the world business (as pointed out by Mal) is a sham that only a dream would conceive.  And with this perspective I don&#039;t have a problem trying to envision how hard it would be to create a dream of this size and magnitude because our brains create dreams of this size every night.

But I will concede that if you believed that at dream layer 1 - the layer above the movie&#039;s &quot;awake&quot; layer - the dream sharing technology works and Mal and Cobb have dreamed down to the movie&#039;s awake layer... it would have to be one an enormous dream architecture to have been built.  And for him to have forgotten creating (or Mal creating it) seems a bit of a stretch for sure.  So kudos to you.  

But whether you buy it or not, hopefully that makes logical sense.
Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andreas,<br />
Great questions all.  I&#8217;ll try and speak to each of your points in my response.  Not because I would like you convinced one way or another but because from the &#8220;its all a dream&#8221; perspective I think there are answers.</p>
<blockquote><p>Mal’s place of death. Wouldn’t be easier and more logical to stand on the window of their room?</p></blockquote>
<p>After writing so much with so many people about this movie I can&#8217;t remember if I made this point in my original 7 Layers post or not.  But this one scene was a BIG piece of evidence that it was in fact a dream.  The same building next door?  The same room with the same billowing curtains?  Sure, she could have booked a room in the EXACT opposite room in the other building&#8230; but really?  The dream-like qualities of this experience are way way too coincidental for me.  </p>
<blockquote><p>The only totem we see at work throughout the movie (assuming that Eame’s chip is not a totem) is Cobb’s.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some people have posited that Saito and Yusuf didn&#8217;t need totems as they were just visitors and wouldn&#8217;t have normally come along for the ride.  But everyone MIGHT have had one?  We just haven&#8217;t been shown what they are if they do.  Not sure, we only know what Nolan has shown us.  The one that totally baffles me is Cobbe.  Just makes zero since that he wouldn&#8217;t have one of his own.  (At this I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get 42 people saying that his ring is his totem.  But I&#8217;ll reiterate that I don&#8217;t believe that &#8220;nothing&#8221; could be a totem.  NOTHING that turns into a ring when in dream.)</p>
<blockquote><p>So accepting that we are actually watching a dream, it has to be a really really huge one and the characters are set apart from each other.</p></blockquote>
<p>  This is a really good point.  I hadn&#8217;t specifically thought of this before.  </p>
<p>I personally maintain that the whole concept of the dream sharing technology is a dream.  That the architecting of dreams is a dream.  That the whole Cobol run around the world business (as pointed out by Mal) is a sham that only a dream would conceive.  And with this perspective I don&#8217;t have a problem trying to envision how hard it would be to create a dream of this size and magnitude because our brains create dreams of this size every night.</p>
<p>But I will concede that if you believed that at dream layer 1 &#8211; the layer above the movie&#8217;s &#8220;awake&#8221; layer &#8211; the dream sharing technology works and Mal and Cobb have dreamed down to the movie&#8217;s awake layer&#8230; it would have to be one an enormous dream architecture to have been built.  And for him to have forgotten creating (or Mal creating it) seems a bit of a stretch for sure.  So kudos to you.  </p>
<p>But whether you buy it or not, hopefully that makes logical sense.<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Totems Explanation by Andreas</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/08/02/inception-totems-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=522#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>Hey all! I was going through the comments and still, after watching the movie 5 times, i haven&#039;t made my mind as to whether we are watching reality (with sub-layers of dreams) or a huge dream.

I just wanted to share which points of the movie i find &quot;disturbing&quot;.

1. Mal&#039;s place of death. Wouldn&#039;t be easier and more logical to stand on the window of their room?

2. The only totem we see at work throughout the movie (assuming that Eame&#039;s chip is not a totem) is Cobb&#039;s. Didn&#039;t the other characters feel the need to make reality checks? Of course somebody could say that they haven&#039;t experienced limbo as Cobb presumably had done with Mal. 

3. Another thing is Mombasa. Let me explain. Cobb goes to Mombasa, Kenya where he meets Eames, Saito and Jusuf while Arthur stays behind in Paris(apparently?) with Ariadne. Now when Arthur is describing to Ariadne the technique of setting the dream level boundaries with paradoxes like Penrose stairs he is asked by Ariadne how big are the levels. He responds saying anything from a floor to a whole city (In limbo Cobb and Mal built a huge city). So accepting that we are actually watching a dream, it has to be a really really huge one and the characters are set apart from each other, something we don&#039;t have a chance to watch in other parts of the movie. 
So in conclusion we have 4 characters talking in Africa (on top of that one of them,Cobb, briefly enters a dream at Jusuf&#039;s basement using the strong drug) while 2 other characters are in Paris, talking inside another dream. Seems a little odd even if this two dream events don&#039;t coincide chronologically. 

But as I&#039;ve said in the beginning i haven&#039;t decided yet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all! I was going through the comments and still, after watching the movie 5 times, i haven&#8217;t made my mind as to whether we are watching reality (with sub-layers of dreams) or a huge dream.</p>
<p>I just wanted to share which points of the movie i find &#8220;disturbing&#8221;.</p>
<p>1. Mal&#8217;s place of death. Wouldn&#8217;t be easier and more logical to stand on the window of their room?</p>
<p>2. The only totem we see at work throughout the movie (assuming that Eame&#8217;s chip is not a totem) is Cobb&#8217;s. Didn&#8217;t the other characters feel the need to make reality checks? Of course somebody could say that they haven&#8217;t experienced limbo as Cobb presumably had done with Mal. </p>
<p>3. Another thing is Mombasa. Let me explain. Cobb goes to Mombasa, Kenya where he meets Eames, Saito and Jusuf while Arthur stays behind in Paris(apparently?) with Ariadne. Now when Arthur is describing to Ariadne the technique of setting the dream level boundaries with paradoxes like Penrose stairs he is asked by Ariadne how big are the levels. He responds saying anything from a floor to a whole city (In limbo Cobb and Mal built a huge city). So accepting that we are actually watching a dream, it has to be a really really huge one and the characters are set apart from each other, something we don&#8217;t have a chance to watch in other parts of the movie.<br />
So in conclusion we have 4 characters talking in Africa (on top of that one of them,Cobb, briefly enters a dream at Jusuf&#8217;s basement using the strong drug) while 2 other characters are in Paris, talking inside another dream. Seems a little odd even if this two dream events don&#8217;t coincide chronologically. </p>
<p>But as I&#8217;ve said in the beginning i haven&#8217;t decided yet. <img src='http://taylorholmes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by @Cicero4PatPro</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-9998</link>
		<dc:creator>@Cicero4PatPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-9998</guid>
		<description>Hey, stopping back by to see if anything new came up.  Taylor knows Im on the machine didn&#039;t work side....

The tanks and the hats are the same thing folks, they&#039;re the great diversion used by Angier (and Nolan) to make us think the machine is magical.  

Nightly, Root would fall through the floor to saftey, allowing Angier to recieve his &#039;Prestige&#039; n balcony.  Root is a better actor when treated well, Ainger made sure of that the second time.  Of course Angier knew eventually Borden would come and try to sabatoge his trick, think about how many times they do it to each other throughout the movie!
Paraphrasing here...but remember this line before the real transporterd man run...
Cutter: what kind of billing are you looking for

Ainger: The kind Borden cant ignore

Ainger/Cadlow is loaded.  Buys tanks to be prepared for the night Borden shows up and goes underneath, this is how he can frame Borden, and rid himself of Root, the only other guy knowing the trick.  The tank gets moved from center stage to beneath every night, Ainger scopes the crowd then informs blind stagehands of slight change on the special night.

Ainger never knew about the twin, hence never knowing Borden would arrive to shoot him. If machine worked his monlouge would have started with &quot;your machine worked too!!&quot; At that point Ainger was just preparing to destroy all the evidence(that he bought from the court/police/mourge... including Roots body in the one tank.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, stopping back by to see if anything new came up.  Taylor knows Im on the machine didn&#8217;t work side&#8230;.</p>
<p>The tanks and the hats are the same thing folks, they&#8217;re the great diversion used by Angier (and Nolan) to make us think the machine is magical.  </p>
<p>Nightly, Root would fall through the floor to saftey, allowing Angier to recieve his &#8216;Prestige&#8217; n balcony.  Root is a better actor when treated well, Ainger made sure of that the second time.  Of course Angier knew eventually Borden would come and try to sabatoge his trick, think about how many times they do it to each other throughout the movie!<br />
Paraphrasing here&#8230;but remember this line before the real transporterd man run&#8230;<br />
Cutter: what kind of billing are you looking for</p>
<p>Ainger: The kind Borden cant ignore</p>
<p>Ainger/Cadlow is loaded.  Buys tanks to be prepared for the night Borden shows up and goes underneath, this is how he can frame Borden, and rid himself of Root, the only other guy knowing the trick.  The tank gets moved from center stage to beneath every night, Ainger scopes the crowd then informs blind stagehands of slight change on the special night.</p>
<p>Ainger never knew about the twin, hence never knowing Borden would arrive to shoot him. If machine worked his monlouge would have started with &#8220;your machine worked too!!&#8221; At that point Ainger was just preparing to destroy all the evidence(that he bought from the court/police/mourge&#8230; including Roots body in the one tank.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Quotes by taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2010/08/23/inception-quotes/comment-page-1/#comment-9996</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=622#comment-9996</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick,
sorry for the delay.  Is this the one you were wanting?  Not nearly as interesting as the first one about the totems.  

&lt;b&gt;Ariadne:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;You going under on your own?&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Cobb:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;No, uh... Just running some experiments.  I didn&#039;t realize anyone was here.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Ariadne:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;Yeah, I was working on my totem actually.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Cobb:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;Here, let me take a look.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Ariadne:&lt;/b&gt;  shakes her head.
&lt;b&gt;Cobb:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;So you&#039;re learning.&quot; 
&lt;b&gt;Ariadne:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;An elegent solution for keeping track of reality. Was it your idea?&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Cobb:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;It was Mal&#039;s actually.  This one was her&#039;s. She&#039;d spin it in a dream and it would never topple.  It would just spin and spin.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Ariadne:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;Arthur told me she passed away.&quot;
&lt;b&gt;Cobb:&lt;/b&gt;  &quot;How are the mazes coming along?&quot;

Until next time,
Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick,<br />
sorry for the delay.  Is this the one you were wanting?  Not nearly as interesting as the first one about the totems.  </p>
<p><b>Ariadne:</b>  &#8220;You going under on your own?&#8221;<br />
<b>Cobb:</b>  &#8220;No, uh&#8230; Just running some experiments.  I didn&#8217;t realize anyone was here.&#8221;<br />
<b>Ariadne:</b>  &#8220;Yeah, I was working on my totem actually.&#8221;<br />
<b>Cobb:</b>  &#8220;Here, let me take a look.&#8221;<br />
<b>Ariadne:</b>  shakes her head.<br />
<b>Cobb:</b>  &#8220;So you&#8217;re learning.&#8221;<br />
<b>Ariadne:</b>  &#8220;An elegent solution for keeping track of reality. Was it your idea?&#8221;<br />
<b>Cobb:</b>  &#8220;It was Mal&#8217;s actually.  This one was her&#8217;s. She&#8217;d spin it in a dream and it would never topple.  It would just spin and spin.&#8221;<br />
<b>Ariadne:</b>  &#8220;Arthur told me she passed away.&#8221;<br />
<b>Cobb:</b>  &#8220;How are the mazes coming along?&#8221;</p>
<p>Until next time,<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Prestige Explained by Taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorholmes.com/2009/08/26/the-prestige-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-9994</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=273#comment-9994</guid>
		<description>Clarify for me where I was reaching and I&#039;d be happy to firm things up for ya.  Watch it again.  Read the theory.  Voilà - insta-enlightenment just add water.  You&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarify for me where I was reaching and I&#8217;d be happy to firm things up for ya.  Watch it again.  Read the theory.  Voilà &#8211; insta-enlightenment just add water.  You&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
