<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: La La Land Movie Review and Ending Explained	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 19:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-923218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-923218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-923009&quot;&gt;Jemma&lt;/a&gt;.

So smart. Yes, totally, it is a polemic against this &#039;one true love&#039; fallacy. 

There was a guy that did the math on individuals finding similar individuals (religion, IQ, education, experience) which we all look for in a mate. Man, what was that guy&#039;s name? I&#039;d look him up but my computer is in mid-freefall and highly doubt it could handle one more tab being opened. Anyway, the larger point there was that there are decidedly FEW people that fall into our desired category of &#039;mate material&#039;. It&#039;s a wonder that anyone gets hooked up at all. Think several thousand in New York City area type of numbers. Ah, found him on my phone, think his name is Peter Backus. And while I don&#039;t subscribe to his specific thesis, his general tenet is interesting. There are decidedly few people in the world that I am compatible with. Now granted, love doesn&#039;t work like that... but you get the larger point. Love is tricky. And very very unlike what the movies would have you believe. 

I personally will have to take your word for it when it comes to how beautiful past relationships can be... cough. haha. But I get your point. The sum of our experiences make up the sum of who we have become. And to have such a idyllic looking film, with dance sequences on LA freeways espouse such a non-idyllic viewpoint?? Mind blowing really. And actually almost too much for our brains to handle. Which, I think, is why most people dislike the ending fairly rabidly. But is why I adore the ending. Such a great right hook that is straight out of reality. But, that&#039;s just my own two cents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-923009">Jemma</a>.</p>
<p>So smart. Yes, totally, it is a polemic against this &#8216;one true love&#8217; fallacy. </p>
<p>There was a guy that did the math on individuals finding similar individuals (religion, IQ, education, experience) which we all look for in a mate. Man, what was that guy&#8217;s name? I&#8217;d look him up but my computer is in mid-freefall and highly doubt it could handle one more tab being opened. Anyway, the larger point there was that there are decidedly FEW people that fall into our desired category of &#8216;mate material&#8217;. It&#8217;s a wonder that anyone gets hooked up at all. Think several thousand in New York City area type of numbers. Ah, found him on my phone, think his name is Peter Backus. And while I don&#8217;t subscribe to his specific thesis, his general tenet is interesting. There are decidedly few people in the world that I am compatible with. Now granted, love doesn&#8217;t work like that&#8230; but you get the larger point. Love is tricky. And very very unlike what the movies would have you believe. </p>
<p>I personally will have to take your word for it when it comes to how beautiful past relationships can be&#8230; cough. haha. But I get your point. The sum of our experiences make up the sum of who we have become. And to have such a idyllic looking film, with dance sequences on LA freeways espouse such a non-idyllic viewpoint?? Mind blowing really. And actually almost too much for our brains to handle. Which, I think, is why most people dislike the ending fairly rabidly. But is why I adore the ending. Such a great right hook that is straight out of reality. But, that&#8217;s just my own two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jemma		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-923009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jemma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 11:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-923009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887837&quot;&gt;Taylor Holmes&lt;/a&gt;.

I totally agree with the whole &#039;is this movie telling us to follow our dreams at all costs??&#039; thing. What I took from it was that life is a compromise - we all have our individual paths that we walk down, and some things will work out while others won&#039;t. I felt like it showed what a fallacy &#039;one true love&#039; and the romanticism that our culture worships is, and that the (often multiple) people you fall in love with in life are actually a huge part of shaping your character and future (Sebastian encouraging Mia to follow her dreams). Movies tend to focus on &#039;the one&#039;, where no other romantic partner matters - here I feel it showed what a beautiful gift past relationships can be, and how it&#039;s important to let go sometimes while still appreciating what was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887837">Taylor Holmes</a>.</p>
<p>I totally agree with the whole &#8216;is this movie telling us to follow our dreams at all costs??&#8217; thing. What I took from it was that life is a compromise &#8211; we all have our individual paths that we walk down, and some things will work out while others won&#8217;t. I felt like it showed what a fallacy &#8216;one true love&#8217; and the romanticism that our culture worships is, and that the (often multiple) people you fall in love with in life are actually a huge part of shaping your character and future (Sebastian encouraging Mia to follow her dreams). Movies tend to focus on &#8216;the one&#8217;, where no other romantic partner matters &#8211; here I feel it showed what a beautiful gift past relationships can be, and how it&#8217;s important to let go sometimes while still appreciating what was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-902768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 09:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-902768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Incongruous&quot; ending? You got that right, motherfucker.
Just watched LaLa Land on DVD.
My take?
I found your website by typing the following into Google - &quot;LaLa Land fucked up ending&quot;. You were like #4 in the results.
Look. I was awestruck by the sets, the acting, the production design, the directing, et al....
And part of what floored me, I admit, was that simmering current of reality amidst all that magical realism. For example, watching Mia break down outside the movie theatre after the heartbreaking opening/closing night of her 1 woman play...&quot;I&#039;m done!&quot;. As that scene developed, I was struck by the dichotomy of the mid 20th century musical and what Damien Chazelle was trying to accomplish here (analogous to the movie&#039;s &quot;pure jazz&quot; vs. an ever changing, artistic interpretation). I mean, could you imagine Debbie Reynold&#039;s and Gene Kelly bringing that real emotion to their musicals? I loved it!
But here&#039;s the deal --- what was evident THROUGHOUT the movie (from the score to the dancing to the production design) was that any deviation from the traditional musical was merely an update to the form. That the undercurrent of 2016 relevancy to life in LA would be subsumed by the overall thematic demands of what LaLa Land actually is::: Singing In The Rain...not West Side Story.
LaLa Land is a love story...to LA/Hollywood and to 2 young lovers. That&#039;s the premise and the bargain that the director makes with us throughout 4/5ths of the film. The entire movie begins and progresses from that simple viewpoint. But the ending? What a fucking sucker punch!
Sure it&#039;s just a movie, but after investing 2 hours into this top notch production....how about an emotional payoff!....not a heart ripping, ass/mind fuck?!!!
It&#039;s a love story, not Apocalypse Now.
And the bullshit, inverted It&#039;s A Wonderful Life take on what could have been is nothing more than emotional blackmail.
Final analysis--- first 2 hours of the movie = 5 stars
Last 15 minutes? If I had the big fork that my granddad used to carve Thanksgiving turkey...I would&#039;ve stuck it in Damien Chazelle&#039;s face.
Pishy caca, indeed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Incongruous&#8221; ending? You got that right, motherfucker.<br />
Just watched LaLa Land on DVD.<br />
My take?<br />
I found your website by typing the following into Google &#8211; &#8220;LaLa Land fucked up ending&#8221;. You were like #4 in the results.<br />
Look. I was awestruck by the sets, the acting, the production design, the directing, et al&#8230;.<br />
And part of what floored me, I admit, was that simmering current of reality amidst all that magical realism. For example, watching Mia break down outside the movie theatre after the heartbreaking opening/closing night of her 1 woman play&#8230;&#8221;I&#8217;m done!&#8221;. As that scene developed, I was struck by the dichotomy of the mid 20th century musical and what Damien Chazelle was trying to accomplish here (analogous to the movie&#8217;s &#8220;pure jazz&#8221; vs. an ever changing, artistic interpretation). I mean, could you imagine Debbie Reynold&#8217;s and Gene Kelly bringing that real emotion to their musicals? I loved it!<br />
But here&#8217;s the deal &#8212; what was evident THROUGHOUT the movie (from the score to the dancing to the production design) was that any deviation from the traditional musical was merely an update to the form. That the undercurrent of 2016 relevancy to life in LA would be subsumed by the overall thematic demands of what LaLa Land actually is::: Singing In The Rain&#8230;not West Side Story.<br />
LaLa Land is a love story&#8230;to LA/Hollywood and to 2 young lovers. That&#8217;s the premise and the bargain that the director makes with us throughout 4/5ths of the film. The entire movie begins and progresses from that simple viewpoint. But the ending? What a fucking sucker punch!<br />
Sure it&#8217;s just a movie, but after investing 2 hours into this top notch production&#8230;.how about an emotional payoff!&#8230;.not a heart ripping, ass/mind fuck?!!!<br />
It&#8217;s a love story, not Apocalypse Now.<br />
And the bullshit, inverted It&#8217;s A Wonderful Life take on what could have been is nothing more than emotional blackmail.<br />
Final analysis&#8212; first 2 hours of the movie = 5 stars<br />
Last 15 minutes? If I had the big fork that my granddad used to carve Thanksgiving turkey&#8230;I would&#8217;ve stuck it in Damien Chazelle&#8217;s face.<br />
Pishy caca, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-890857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-890857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-890785&quot;&gt;MMZ&lt;/a&gt;.

Fair enough MMZ... 
I buy it. (Never mind the fact that Gosling watched her walked out the door... BUT OK! HAHHA) Seriously though, well thought through. And you are right, we are the sum of all our experiences that have brought us from there &lt;--------- to here ---------&gt; so, yes, I agree. 

Taylor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-890785">MMZ</a>.</p>
<p>Fair enough MMZ&#8230;<br />
I buy it. (Never mind the fact that Gosling watched her walked out the door&#8230; BUT OK! HAHHA) Seriously though, well thought through. And you are right, we are the sum of all our experiences that have brought us from there <--------- to here ---------> so, yes, I agree. </p>
<p>Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MMZ		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-890785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MMZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-890785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Taylor,
Great review, thank you. I loved the movie. But for me it WAS a romantic ending.  Maybe not with the &quot;prince&quot; we got to know and love, but it was a prince nonetheless.
For me the movie spoke of all those people that in a way or another help us get were we are, and makes us who we are.  We make the decision of giving them an active role or a seconday role and they do the same with us. We have the power to either (a) help them achieve their/our dreams and then move on to be happy with someone else (or alone, in Sebastian&#039;s case);  or (b)  continue along the same path and be equally happy together. 
For me the ending showed happiness is not attached to someone else, hapiness is within us. WE are a prince/princess on our own, and we elevate our partner to that status with the decisions we make.
Is pragmatic romanticism a thing? Because this movie would be the perfect way to explain it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Taylor,<br />
Great review, thank you. I loved the movie. But for me it WAS a romantic ending.  Maybe not with the &#8220;prince&#8221; we got to know and love, but it was a prince nonetheless.<br />
For me the movie spoke of all those people that in a way or another help us get were we are, and makes us who we are.  We make the decision of giving them an active role or a seconday role and they do the same with us. We have the power to either (a) help them achieve their/our dreams and then move on to be happy with someone else (or alone, in Sebastian&#8217;s case);  or (b)  continue along the same path and be equally happy together.<br />
For me the ending showed happiness is not attached to someone else, hapiness is within us. WE are a prince/princess on our own, and we elevate our partner to that status with the decisions we make.<br />
Is pragmatic romanticism a thing? Because this movie would be the perfect way to explain it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-887837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887826&quot;&gt;Lisa&lt;/a&gt;.

Great response Lisa... 
(And perfect English too! Well done!) I totally understand what you are saying. You were hoping for more clarity on their relationship and more of a single direction for them. I take it that you didn&#039;t see the movie making sense. 

Which is interesting, because the movie just kicked ass at the Golden Globes awards and will probably sweep at the Oscars as well. Just a guess on my part. So we have to ask ourselves... if the critics dug it, what were they digging? (Sorry, using a LOT of hard to understand colloquialisms!) Anyway, I personally liked the disjointed elements of the happiness of the dancing and singing juxtaposed with the unhappy ending. Personally it really messed with the audience a ton and makes us think. Huhh. Wait. Is career more important than family? Is family more important than career? Are our dreams the most important thing? Just made me think. Which is what I want from a good movie. 

Thanks a ton for the thoughts!!
Taylor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887826">Lisa</a>.</p>
<p>Great response Lisa&#8230;<br />
(And perfect English too! Well done!) I totally understand what you are saying. You were hoping for more clarity on their relationship and more of a single direction for them. I take it that you didn&#8217;t see the movie making sense. </p>
<p>Which is interesting, because the movie just kicked ass at the Golden Globes awards and will probably sweep at the Oscars as well. Just a guess on my part. So we have to ask ourselves&#8230; if the critics dug it, what were they digging? (Sorry, using a LOT of hard to understand colloquialisms!) Anyway, I personally liked the disjointed elements of the happiness of the dancing and singing juxtaposed with the unhappy ending. Personally it really messed with the audience a ton and makes us think. Huhh. Wait. Is career more important than family? Is family more important than career? Are our dreams the most important thing? Just made me think. Which is what I want from a good movie. </p>
<p>Thanks a ton for the thoughts!!<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2017/01/03/la-la-land-movie-review-and-ending-explained/#comment-887826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=13125#comment-887826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Taylor,

Wondering what the hell this movie was about after I saw it in the theatre, I started googling and I read your article. Although I agree with you on the fact that the end of this movie was more of a reality check and a new turn on a happy ending, although, I absolutely hated it. 
My favourite movie of all time is &#039;500 Days Of Summer&#039;, a movie that also doesn&#039;t end the way you want it to. But I feel like that gave the movie more strength, and it made me quite emotional because I recognized the heartbroken feeling that Tom (main character) had. In this movie I wasn&#039;t feeling the love and passion of Mia and Seb at all. I missed the cute and silly parts in the movie, and I felt like there were pieces of the movie that the directors had cut out. I, for example, was expecting that there was going to be a plot twist with Mia&#039;s aunt, or that we saw her and got to know her. I also felt like it was weird that Mia was going to her parents, we didn&#039;t see much of them and I felt like that was a bummer. At some point I even thought they were going to write a musical together, named &#039;Chicago the musical&#039; (All That Jazz... get it?) but that ,sadly, didn&#039;t happen. 

Anyway, I thought this was going to be my next favourite movie, but I think I missed the point. Thank you for explaining some parts though! By the way, I&#039;m not trying to convince anyone by this comment, I just wanted to let you know my opinion about the movie because I really recognized the &#039;what WAS that?&#039; that you wrote in your article. 

Greetings from Holland (sorry if my English is not correct sometimes)

Lisa]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taylor,</p>
<p>Wondering what the hell this movie was about after I saw it in the theatre, I started googling and I read your article. Although I agree with you on the fact that the end of this movie was more of a reality check and a new turn on a happy ending, although, I absolutely hated it.<br />
My favourite movie of all time is &#8216;500 Days Of Summer&#8217;, a movie that also doesn&#8217;t end the way you want it to. But I feel like that gave the movie more strength, and it made me quite emotional because I recognized the heartbroken feeling that Tom (main character) had. In this movie I wasn&#8217;t feeling the love and passion of Mia and Seb at all. I missed the cute and silly parts in the movie, and I felt like there were pieces of the movie that the directors had cut out. I, for example, was expecting that there was going to be a plot twist with Mia&#8217;s aunt, or that we saw her and got to know her. I also felt like it was weird that Mia was going to her parents, we didn&#8217;t see much of them and I felt like that was a bummer. At some point I even thought they were going to write a musical together, named &#8216;Chicago the musical&#8217; (All That Jazz&#8230; get it?) but that ,sadly, didn&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>Anyway, I thought this was going to be my next favourite movie, but I think I missed the point. Thank you for explaining some parts though! By the way, I&#8217;m not trying to convince anyone by this comment, I just wanted to let you know my opinion about the movie because I really recognized the &#8216;what WAS that?&#8217; that you wrote in your article. </p>
<p>Greetings from Holland (sorry if my English is not correct sometimes)</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
