<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Explaining why Velvet Buzzsaw is Art Criticism Perfection	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2019/02/06/explaining-why-velvet-buzzsaw-is-art-criticism-perfection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/02/06/explaining-why-velvet-buzzsaw-is-art-criticism-perfection/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 04:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/02/06/explaining-why-velvet-buzzsaw-is-art-criticism-perfection/#comment-981374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 04:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=18487#comment-981374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was terrible. Dease&#039;s art never even kills anyone, other art does (why has no one seen this?) Was is art possessed? Dunno, never said. How did his art get other art to kill? That giant steel ball wasn&#039;t by Dease. The monkey painting in the garage wasn&#039;t a Dease. The robo-hobo wasn&#039;t a Dease. The art in the shop that infiltrates Josephina wasn&#039;t a Dease. This movie was an idea in search of a plot; full of holes. What was the point of Malkovich shooting hoops. Nada. Of the assistant from (Kansas?) nada. Bad film making, bad story, waste of time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was terrible. Dease&#8217;s art never even kills anyone, other art does (why has no one seen this?) Was is art possessed? Dunno, never said. How did his art get other art to kill? That giant steel ball wasn&#8217;t by Dease. The monkey painting in the garage wasn&#8217;t a Dease. The robo-hobo wasn&#8217;t a Dease. The art in the shop that infiltrates Josephina wasn&#8217;t a Dease. This movie was an idea in search of a plot; full of holes. What was the point of Malkovich shooting hoops. Nada. Of the assistant from (Kansas?) nada. Bad film making, bad story, waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
