<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Cultural Relevance of The Invisible Man	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:57:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/#comment-1036687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20946#comment-1036687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, another bleak movie that I picked randomly when feeling quite down about the current world situation we&#039;re in and now feel even more down. I knew you&#039;d have already covered it though. Maybe a bit silly in places with the invisi suit but your summary is spot on and it&#039;s a great movie overall. Glad I had my cat and a bottle of wine with me though,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, another bleak movie that I picked randomly when feeling quite down about the current world situation we&#8217;re in and now feel even more down. I knew you&#8217;d have already covered it though. Maybe a bit silly in places with the invisi suit but your summary is spot on and it&#8217;s a great movie overall. Glad I had my cat and a bottle of wine with me though,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/#comment-1036460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20946#comment-1036460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/#comment-1036381&quot;&gt;Spencer M.&lt;/a&gt;.

You are asking about a sequel from within the construct of the fiction. It&#039;s easier to figure that out through real world numbers. The budget on this film was $7m (???!!!!). Usually big box office movies will double their production in adverts - but with a budget this small, maybe they spent $20m. Their opening weekend was $28m - which was around break even from a rough guesstimate standpoint. The global box for this movie was like, 130m before it was cracked in the face by Covid-19. But, I am hearing that Universal is releasing it online on March 20 for $20? With everyone at home, it probably will do really well in that market. The word of mouth on this thing was pretty huge. Maybe it rides to $200m? $250m? More?

So - now, to answer your question - do I think the invisi-suit will come back in a sequel, or was it too damaged? No, that suit definitely wasn&#039;t too damaged! hahahaha. But this screenplay will be difficult to reproduce unless it lapses back into normal horror or super hero tropes. We&#039;ll see though. If you figure out how to bring Elizabeth Moss back for the sequel and I&#039;m in. But man, that&#039;s going to take an Eric Heisserer screenplay writing level of brilliance to pull off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/#comment-1036381">Spencer M.</a>.</p>
<p>You are asking about a sequel from within the construct of the fiction. It&#8217;s easier to figure that out through real world numbers. The budget on this film was $7m (???!!!!). Usually big box office movies will double their production in adverts &#8211; but with a budget this small, maybe they spent $20m. Their opening weekend was $28m &#8211; which was around break even from a rough guesstimate standpoint. The global box for this movie was like, 130m before it was cracked in the face by Covid-19. But, I am hearing that Universal is releasing it online on March 20 for $20? With everyone at home, it probably will do really well in that market. The word of mouth on this thing was pretty huge. Maybe it rides to $200m? $250m? More?</p>
<p>So &#8211; now, to answer your question &#8211; do I think the invisi-suit will come back in a sequel, or was it too damaged? No, that suit definitely wasn&#8217;t too damaged! hahahaha. But this screenplay will be difficult to reproduce unless it lapses back into normal horror or super hero tropes. We&#8217;ll see though. If you figure out how to bring Elizabeth Moss back for the sequel and I&#8217;m in. But man, that&#8217;s going to take an Eric Heisserer screenplay writing level of brilliance to pull off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Spencer M.		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2020/03/10/the-cultural-relevance-of-the-invisible-man/#comment-1036381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20946#comment-1036381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you think the invisi-suit will pop up in a sequel or do all the suits get so messed up that none of them can be used again?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the invisi-suit will pop up in a sequel or do all the suits get so messed up that none of them can be used again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
