<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Taylor Holmes inc. 	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:43:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Top 100 Netflix Documentaries to Watch Right Now (#75 to #71) by Chengtian Ding		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2026/07/17/top-100-netflix-documentaries-75-to-71/#comment-1195347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chengtian Ding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=33753#comment-1195347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This list is exactly what I needed for my weekend binge! I can completely agree with *The Social Dilemma*—it completely changed how I look at my phone. I hadn’t heard of *Unknown Number* yet, but anything directed by Skye Borgman goes straight to my watchlist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is exactly what I needed for my weekend binge! I can completely agree with *The Social Dilemma*—it completely changed how I look at my phone. I hadn’t heard of *Unknown Number* yet, but anything directed by Skye Borgman goes straight to my watchlist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Little Things Movie Discussed and Explained by Sasha Dence		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2021/02/05/the-little-things-movie-discussed-and-explained/#comment-1195346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sasha Dence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=23561#comment-1195346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Definitely aiming for ambiguity - and that is a bit forced, seems to me. Almost as though  the director/writer wanted a kind of &quot;gotcha&quot; moment in the sense that we can feel like we should realise that good and evil are grey areas. It seems like that was the point - but I think it fails because they aren&#039;t. While the detectives are &quot;no angels&quot; and make some major mistakes, like killing the wrong people! they are good people, or at least, want to be. The Sparma character does not want to be. He wants to make other people miserable. While ultimately there may not be easy justice or uncomplicated characters or moral clarity, the detectives and the suspect-- at least as much as is given to the viewer to know -- are not coming from the same place. The detectives are trying to find someone who kills people other people love. They fail. They fail also in terms of their own moral code. They kill people they should not have killed. They cover up their deeds. But unlike Sparma they do not enjoy inflicting pain. They are not aroused by someone else&#039;s murder (again, at least as far as the viewer can see) which to me is a bit damning for Sparma regardless of whether he is in fact the killer. That the dectectives both lose their cool at different points while not admirable, sure is understandable. One has had his life wrecked already and had a heart attack. The other is having his life wrecked because he cares too much -- seeing his children as possible victims. He is exhausted, he is almost falling alseep on his feet, the suspect ridicules, bullies, gaslights and taunts him into committing a crime. As he said earlier when the other detective lost his cool in the interrogation room, &quot;you lost control!&quot; He achieved his ends which is to make good people do bad things. That makes him a killer in my books regardless of whether he actually kills. He loves killing -- he celebrates those who do and enjoys the suffering they cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely aiming for ambiguity &#8211; and that is a bit forced, seems to me. Almost as though  the director/writer wanted a kind of &#8220;gotcha&#8221; moment in the sense that we can feel like we should realise that good and evil are grey areas. It seems like that was the point &#8211; but I think it fails because they aren&#8217;t. While the detectives are &#8220;no angels&#8221; and make some major mistakes, like killing the wrong people! they are good people, or at least, want to be. The Sparma character does not want to be. He wants to make other people miserable. While ultimately there may not be easy justice or uncomplicated characters or moral clarity, the detectives and the suspect&#8211; at least as much as is given to the viewer to know &#8212; are not coming from the same place. The detectives are trying to find someone who kills people other people love. They fail. They fail also in terms of their own moral code. They kill people they should not have killed. They cover up their deeds. But unlike Sparma they do not enjoy inflicting pain. They are not aroused by someone else&#8217;s murder (again, at least as far as the viewer can see) which to me is a bit damning for Sparma regardless of whether he is in fact the killer. That the dectectives both lose their cool at different points while not admirable, sure is understandable. One has had his life wrecked already and had a heart attack. The other is having his life wrecked because he cares too much &#8212; seeing his children as possible victims. He is exhausted, he is almost falling alseep on his feet, the suspect ridicules, bullies, gaslights and taunts him into committing a crime. As he said earlier when the other detective lost his cool in the interrogation room, &#8220;you lost control!&#8221; He achieved his ends which is to make good people do bad things. That makes him a killer in my books regardless of whether he actually kills. He loves killing &#8212; he celebrates those who do and enjoys the suffering they cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sicario Day of the Soldado Explained and Reviewed by Robert		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2018/07/04/sicario-day-of-the-soldado-explained-and-reviewed/#comment-1195345</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=16315#comment-1195345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[2nd Godfather was very good. And certainly Dune 2 is the best follow up movie I have ever seen!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd Godfather was very good. And certainly Dune 2 is the best follow up movie I have ever seen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Backrooms Movie Every Major Theory Explained The Complete Breakdown by animal symbols		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2026/06/05/the-backrooms-movie-every-major-theory-explained-the-complete-breakdown/#comment-1195344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[animal symbols]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=33674#comment-1195344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing~]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Invite Movie Family Tree The Play The Film and Every Remake by Movie Fan		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2026/07/12/the-invite-movie-family-tree-the-play-the-film-and-every-remake/#comment-1195343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movie Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=33930#comment-1195343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you liked this movie, you’ll love « Carnage » (based on a play by the talented Yasmina Reza), as well as « Arnaud » (starring the amazing Renate Reinsve in an unforgettably good yet uncomfortable scene).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you liked this movie, you’ll love « Carnage » (based on a play by the talented Yasmina Reza), as well as « Arnaud » (starring the amazing Renate Reinsve in an unforgettably good yet uncomfortable scene).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Invite Movie Family Tree The Play The Film and Every Remake by Movie Fan		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2026/07/12/the-invite-movie-family-tree-the-play-the-film-and-every-remake/#comment-1195342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Movie Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=33930#comment-1195342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just happened to watch the Swiss-German version on TV a week or two ago, without having heard of either the original Spanish version or the new American version with Cruz. So basically with no biases. I thought it was very good - very well acted and gripping, and they managed to make an outrageous story totally believable. I loved the fatigued and irascible husband, and his wife straining to step out of her dull life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just happened to watch the Swiss-German version on TV a week or two ago, without having heard of either the original Spanish version or the new American version with Cruz. So basically with no biases. I thought it was very good &#8211; very well acted and gripping, and they managed to make an outrageous story totally believable. I loved the fatigued and irascible husband, and his wife straining to step out of her dull life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Mysteries of the Universe&#8230; by google		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2012/08/11/the-mysteries-of-the-universe/#comment-1195341</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[google]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=1111#comment-1195341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mga manika sa sex https://tl.yourdoll.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mga manika sa sex <a href="https://tl.yourdoll.com" rel="nofollow ugc">https://tl.yourdoll.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Books We Love A Year End Round up by png2icon		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2013/12/17/books-we-love-a-year-end-round-up/#comment-1195340</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[png2icon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=3732#comment-1195340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These roundup formats are genuinely useful — I save posts like this for whenever I can&#039;t decide what to read or watch next. Was there a single fiction standout from your year, or did nonfiction and documentaries completely dominate?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These roundup formats are genuinely useful — I save posts like this for whenever I can&#8217;t decide what to read or watch next. Was there a single fiction standout from your year, or did nonfiction and documentaries completely dominate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Books We Love A Year End Round up by Magiz		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2013/12/17/books-we-love-a-year-end-round-up/#comment-1195339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=3732#comment-1195339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Year-end reading lists are my favorite tradition, and I always appreciate ones with actual commentary instead of just covers. Saving several of these for the slow week between Christmas and New Year. Do you do a mid-year follow-up to see which ones actually held up?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Year-end reading lists are my favorite tradition, and I always appreciate ones with actual commentary instead of just covers. Saving several of these for the slow week between Christmas and New Year. Do you do a mid-year follow-up to see which ones actually held up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
