<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Timecrimes Movie Explanation and Interview With Nacho Vigalondo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 17:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 17:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1194561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194560&quot;&gt;Phil Bracco&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey there Phil,
nice to meet you. Gotta say, I have zero idea what you are talking about. I don&#039;t discuss The Lost Daughter in this post at all - this is a conversation about the movie Time Crimes... I also don&#039;t discuss Gyllenhaal in this post either. So, in order to search other posts that you might be errantly attempting to comment on, I searched out my Lost Daughter review and there was nothing there about Gyllenhaal either. I definitely error often, so, my apologies if I offended. I attempted to figure out how to respond, but am currently at a loss. 

Until next time,
Taylor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194560">Phil Bracco</a>.</p>
<p>Hey there Phil,<br />
nice to meet you. Gotta say, I have zero idea what you are talking about. I don&#8217;t discuss The Lost Daughter in this post at all &#8211; this is a conversation about the movie Time Crimes&#8230; I also don&#8217;t discuss Gyllenhaal in this post either. So, in order to search other posts that you might be errantly attempting to comment on, I searched out my Lost Daughter review and there was nothing there about Gyllenhaal either. I definitely error often, so, my apologies if I offended. I attempted to figure out how to respond, but am currently at a loss. </p>
<p>Until next time,<br />
Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Bracco		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Bracco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 15:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1194560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taylor,
WRONG !
I guess you&#039;re the Big Kahuna or something on here ( unknown why), but Gyllenhaal did NOT act in &quot;The Lost Daughter&quot;, her Ferrante adaoptation. Absolutely not.
I guess your sluffing her off as not an A list writer/ director is in stark disagreement with her AW nomination and multiple global awards and accolades she received for TLD.
The other film was a minor appearance...I&#039;m talking about her as a lead actor.
But don&#039;t worry, &quot;the Bride&quot; didn&#039;t test too well, so maybe you&#039;ll get your chance to be accurate this time.
Doubt it, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor,<br />
WRONG !<br />
I guess you&#8217;re the Big Kahuna or something on here ( unknown why), but Gyllenhaal did NOT act in &#8220;The Lost Daughter&#8221;, her Ferrante adaoptation. Absolutely not.<br />
I guess your sluffing her off as not an A list writer/ director is in stark disagreement with her AW nomination and multiple global awards and accolades she received for TLD.<br />
The other film was a minor appearance&#8230;I&#8217;m talking about her as a lead actor.<br />
But don&#8217;t worry, &#8220;the Bride&#8221; didn&#8217;t test too well, so maybe you&#8217;ll get your chance to be accurate this time.<br />
Doubt it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1194551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194550&quot;&gt;Alchomitzy&lt;/a&gt;.

Great question - no, I absolutely do not. That&#039;s a great question. If anyone else has a bead on the trunk, I&#039;d love to hear theories. Is it a Pulp Fiction type epiphany? Interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194550">Alchomitzy</a>.</p>
<p>Great question &#8211; no, I absolutely do not. That&#8217;s a great question. If anyone else has a bead on the trunk, I&#8217;d love to hear theories. Is it a Pulp Fiction type epiphany? Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alchomitzy		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1194550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alchomitzy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1194550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your post, interesting to see the director’s answers (and cool he interacted with you!)

Do you have any theories on the opening of the trunk at the beginning? I remember thinking at the time “this will be significant for some reason,” but I never got a good answer. Some said it’s symbolic/ foreshadowing of how he has to go backward and clean up his mess, is that it?

Is there any reason to believe Hector 2 or 3 were behind it? Make him too tired/ lazy to go to town to continue the loop and get him alone from his wife?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post, interesting to see the director’s answers (and cool he interacted with you!)</p>
<p>Do you have any theories on the opening of the trunk at the beginning? I remember thinking at the time “this will be significant for some reason,” but I never got a good answer. Some said it’s symbolic/ foreshadowing of how he has to go backward and clean up his mess, is that it?</p>
<p>Is there any reason to believe Hector 2 or 3 were behind it? Make him too tired/ lazy to go to town to continue the loop and get him alone from his wife?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: unknownuser111		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1180256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[unknownuser111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1180256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[lol if we go back to near the end of the movie around 1:09:00 mins it seemed as H2 which was the real hector &#038; spawned H3 as H2 goes to hide in the back which the scientist tells H2 about cause h2 didn’t know the future ( *he didn’t know H3 existed yet before the scientist told him* ). but the only real reason h2 knew h3 exist is cause the scientist told him about it BINGO! so is hector a clone? was he even real person? / what if this was a whole lab experiment developed from the scientist to begin with lol? , we really need to know who the scientist is and *i personally think hes the culprit*. &#038; i think what everyone is trying to figure out.

made some slight edits from my last paragraph lol.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol if we go back to near the end of the movie around 1:09:00 mins it seemed as H2 which was the real hector &amp; spawned H3 as H2 goes to hide in the back which the scientist tells H2 about cause h2 didn’t know the future ( *he didn’t know H3 existed yet before the scientist told him* ). but the only real reason h2 knew h3 exist is cause the scientist told him about it BINGO! so is hector a clone? was he even real person? / what if this was a whole lab experiment developed from the scientist to begin with lol? , we really need to know who the scientist is and *i personally think hes the culprit*. &amp; i think what everyone is trying to figure out.</p>
<p>made some slight edits from my last paragraph lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: unknownuser111		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1180255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[unknownuser111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1180255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i honestly think there was a mystery person that we (the viewer) don&#039;t know or a backstory we don&#039;t know about , as you see the scientist knew about everything the whole time cause hector 3 told everything about the other hectors so basically hector 3 literally spawned out of nowhere and the movie gives no description about hector 3 other then him recreating himself in the time machine. 

so the only real question leads to who is the scientist? and why was he there at the lab at the first place cause if you think about it if the scientist wasn&#039;t there none of this would&#039;ve happen and you will see why at my last comment on this post.

so coming from the end of the story he already knew h3 was there the whole time  and went along with it from the beginning of the movie so how did he know hector 3 was coming there to begin with? there&#039;s obviously a backstory on the scientist that we don&#039;t know about , was the scientist the main person who started this to begin with? because the scientist knew everything from hector 3 and when hector 3 went into the time machine he didn&#039;t EVEN EXIST CAUSE H2 WAS ONLY PRESENT AT THE TIME when he was talking to the scientist (getting goosebumps writing this ) , SO HOW DID THE SCIENTIST EVEN KNOW THIS BEGIN WITH?

because h3 wasn&#039;t even alive at the time when the scientist told H2 about it. 


some what ifs?

what if the scientist forcefully made H2 not go in the time machine or maybe went even deeper defending the fuse that he threw out , would h3 even existed?

( it wouldn&#039;t have made sense for the movie because  the scene which the scientist claimed h3 is the one that told the scientist about h2 which was h2 before he spawned another h3. )

what if he broke the movie script / paradigm and seen his own duplicate bodies face 2 face before any events surfaced?

there&#039;s tons of directions this movie could&#039;ve went.

cuz at the end h3 doesn&#039;t even go back to the time machine and all 3 of the hectors are still alive and the scientist , honestly there can be an prequel to the movie where it shows the backstory of the scientist and how did the scientist lure the main hector in IF he was the mystery person or apart of the main character of the backstory and a part 2 where all the hectors meet each other as the sequel.

 but really the real question is who is exactly the scientist? and how did he get hector to even know about the lab in the first place cuz obv the bandage hector was the 1st one before he even got the beginning hector attention. also since there&#039;s no backstory on the 3rd hector other than the scientist telling the bandage hector that hector 3 will be spawned if he got in.

so imagine if the bandaged hector never got in what would happen? there&#039;s a lot of what ifs in the movie.

but i honestly think people wants to know is the backstory of the scientist cause the movie only starts us 1 hour every time hes goes in the time machine so what if hector went back 2 hours? the movie could&#039;ve added a part of him going 2 hours instead of 1 so there&#039;s still a lot of things that could be answered &#038; solved. &#038; i think the scientist was in on this the whole time tbh cause the scientist knew what would happen cause future hector told him and he knew h3 would mess it up as you see in the end.

(quick add on )
lol if we go back to near the end of the movie around 1:09:00 mins it seemed as H2 which was the real hector &#038; spawned H3 as H2 goes to hide in the back which the scientist tells H2 about cause h2 didn&#039;t know the future ( he didn&#039;t exist yet ). but the only real reason h2 knew h3 exist is cause the scientist told him about it BINGO! so is hector a clone? was he even real person / what if this was a whole lab experiment developed from the scientist to begin with lol? , we really need to know who the scientist is &#038; i think what everyone is trying to figure out.

how did the scientist know h3 was there the whole time? that&#039;s the part the movie doesn&#039;t convey as we see h2 spawning h3 INSTEAD OF THE SCIENTIST and which the scientist told h2 about h3 when h3 didn&#039;t even exist before h2 spawned h3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i honestly think there was a mystery person that we (the viewer) don&#8217;t know or a backstory we don&#8217;t know about , as you see the scientist knew about everything the whole time cause hector 3 told everything about the other hectors so basically hector 3 literally spawned out of nowhere and the movie gives no description about hector 3 other then him recreating himself in the time machine. </p>
<p>so the only real question leads to who is the scientist? and why was he there at the lab at the first place cause if you think about it if the scientist wasn&#8217;t there none of this would&#8217;ve happen and you will see why at my last comment on this post.</p>
<p>so coming from the end of the story he already knew h3 was there the whole time  and went along with it from the beginning of the movie so how did he know hector 3 was coming there to begin with? there&#8217;s obviously a backstory on the scientist that we don&#8217;t know about , was the scientist the main person who started this to begin with? because the scientist knew everything from hector 3 and when hector 3 went into the time machine he didn&#8217;t EVEN EXIST CAUSE H2 WAS ONLY PRESENT AT THE TIME when he was talking to the scientist (getting goosebumps writing this ) , SO HOW DID THE SCIENTIST EVEN KNOW THIS BEGIN WITH?</p>
<p>because h3 wasn&#8217;t even alive at the time when the scientist told H2 about it. </p>
<p>some what ifs?</p>
<p>what if the scientist forcefully made H2 not go in the time machine or maybe went even deeper defending the fuse that he threw out , would h3 even existed?</p>
<p>( it wouldn&#8217;t have made sense for the movie because  the scene which the scientist claimed h3 is the one that told the scientist about h2 which was h2 before he spawned another h3. )</p>
<p>what if he broke the movie script / paradigm and seen his own duplicate bodies face 2 face before any events surfaced?</p>
<p>there&#8217;s tons of directions this movie could&#8217;ve went.</p>
<p>cuz at the end h3 doesn&#8217;t even go back to the time machine and all 3 of the hectors are still alive and the scientist , honestly there can be an prequel to the movie where it shows the backstory of the scientist and how did the scientist lure the main hector in IF he was the mystery person or apart of the main character of the backstory and a part 2 where all the hectors meet each other as the sequel.</p>
<p> but really the real question is who is exactly the scientist? and how did he get hector to even know about the lab in the first place cuz obv the bandage hector was the 1st one before he even got the beginning hector attention. also since there&#8217;s no backstory on the 3rd hector other than the scientist telling the bandage hector that hector 3 will be spawned if he got in.</p>
<p>so imagine if the bandaged hector never got in what would happen? there&#8217;s a lot of what ifs in the movie.</p>
<p>but i honestly think people wants to know is the backstory of the scientist cause the movie only starts us 1 hour every time hes goes in the time machine so what if hector went back 2 hours? the movie could&#8217;ve added a part of him going 2 hours instead of 1 so there&#8217;s still a lot of things that could be answered &amp; solved. &amp; i think the scientist was in on this the whole time tbh cause the scientist knew what would happen cause future hector told him and he knew h3 would mess it up as you see in the end.</p>
<p>(quick add on )<br />
lol if we go back to near the end of the movie around 1:09:00 mins it seemed as H2 which was the real hector &amp; spawned H3 as H2 goes to hide in the back which the scientist tells H2 about cause h2 didn&#8217;t know the future ( he didn&#8217;t exist yet ). but the only real reason h2 knew h3 exist is cause the scientist told him about it BINGO! so is hector a clone? was he even real person / what if this was a whole lab experiment developed from the scientist to begin with lol? , we really need to know who the scientist is &amp; i think what everyone is trying to figure out.</p>
<p>how did the scientist know h3 was there the whole time? that&#8217;s the part the movie doesn&#8217;t convey as we see h2 spawning h3 INSTEAD OF THE SCIENTIST and which the scientist told h2 about h3 when h3 didn&#8217;t even exist before h2 spawned h3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elex		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1126689</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1126689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent Explanation but I think there should be one correction in the Diagram. &quot;H2 Learns scientist motivated by H3&quot; should be after the &quot;Hector 1 hides in time Machine&quot;.
H2 knows about H3 later. At the time H1 had already used the Time Machine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Explanation but I think there should be one correction in the Diagram. &#8220;H2 Learns scientist motivated by H3&#8221; should be after the &#8220;Hector 1 hides in time Machine&#8221;.<br />
H2 knows about H3 later. At the time H1 had already used the Time Machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: timetobelogical		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1081744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timetobelogical]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2020 05:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1081744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Timecrimes and predestination are great movies for time travel entertainment but they don&#039;t hold up under any logical scrutiny. In Timecrimes, it makes no sense that Hector would see his future self in the woods as he had no reason to go into the woods. His binoculars would have shown nothing in the woods. The whole premise of the story is illogical. Sure there is a logic to the time loop itself but no logic to how it could start. Same with predestination. But for entertainment value it was great and the ideas in the time loop were fun to consider. Enjoy :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timecrimes and predestination are great movies for time travel entertainment but they don&#8217;t hold up under any logical scrutiny. In Timecrimes, it makes no sense that Hector would see his future self in the woods as he had no reason to go into the woods. His binoculars would have shown nothing in the woods. The whole premise of the story is illogical. Sure there is a logic to the time loop itself but no logic to how it could start. Same with predestination. But for entertainment value it was great and the ideas in the time loop were fun to consider. Enjoy :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sejethom		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2015/02/26/timecrimes-movie-explanation-and-interview-with-nacho-vigalondo/#comment-1034321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sejethom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=7291#comment-1034321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But why did Hector tell the scientist (Nacho) to prevent Hector 2 from travelling in time to become Hector 3?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why did Hector tell the scientist (Nacho) to prevent Hector 2 from travelling in time to become Hector 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
