<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Let Me Explain the Movie Approaching The Unknown To You	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 19:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: el smootho		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-1108674</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[el smootho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-1108674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really interesting to read those explanations and random scenarios which indicates to me that there&#039;s still so much creativity stored in our human spirit.  However, does it really matter if Cap. Stanaforth was actually hallucinating or not? and the whole idea of watching a movie is to take us on a journey into the Director/scriptwriter&#039;s minds, to explore their world and the possibilities they try to draw on the screen.
And what if Stanaforth did actually land on Mars? Maybe that was his goal from the start! Was to get there and be the first human to land on Mars come what may!? 
I actually enjoyed the movie and its message.  Actually, if I was in his shoes and I would have made the same decision, despite the fact that my water supply would be extremely low.  He was aiming for that very &quot;one pure wonder moment&quot;.  And it was really fitting to see Stanaforth all upbeat and pumped at the start of his journey then seeing those 2 other astronauts on the ISS being so down and despondent, couldn&#039;t wait to do back home - then the same feeling took over him later on but he refused to be brought back to Earth.
IMO, one of the hardest components to cater to in any journeys is maintaining a positive mental attitude.  And I think we&#039;ve all seen and experienced a hint of it during our collective Covide lockdown. So, let&#039;s imagine being there alone, locked up in a capsule, traveling deep into Space for nearly 9 months, without any human interaction or even touch! I think it would drive anyone crazy.  But within the framework of the story he actually managed to rise above it all in the end and felt quite victorious, even for brief moments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting to read those explanations and random scenarios which indicates to me that there&#8217;s still so much creativity stored in our human spirit.  However, does it really matter if Cap. Stanaforth was actually hallucinating or not? and the whole idea of watching a movie is to take us on a journey into the Director/scriptwriter&#8217;s minds, to explore their world and the possibilities they try to draw on the screen.<br />
And what if Stanaforth did actually land on Mars? Maybe that was his goal from the start! Was to get there and be the first human to land on Mars come what may!?<br />
I actually enjoyed the movie and its message.  Actually, if I was in his shoes and I would have made the same decision, despite the fact that my water supply would be extremely low.  He was aiming for that very &#8220;one pure wonder moment&#8221;.  And it was really fitting to see Stanaforth all upbeat and pumped at the start of his journey then seeing those 2 other astronauts on the ISS being so down and despondent, couldn&#8217;t wait to do back home &#8211; then the same feeling took over him later on but he refused to be brought back to Earth.<br />
IMO, one of the hardest components to cater to in any journeys is maintaining a positive mental attitude.  And I think we&#8217;ve all seen and experienced a hint of it during our collective Covide lockdown. So, let&#8217;s imagine being there alone, locked up in a capsule, traveling deep into Space for nearly 9 months, without any human interaction or even touch! I think it would drive anyone crazy.  But within the framework of the story he actually managed to rise above it all in the end and felt quite victorious, even for brief moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnnyB		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-1003180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnnyB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-1003180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haha, excellent explanation. Check the rocket when is grounded, it has 6 side boosters, and when it is on flight only 4. Also the space suit on mars does not look like a real space suit, the guy is just using his shoes and white trousers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, excellent explanation. Check the rocket when is grounded, it has 6 side boosters, and when it is on flight only 4. Also the space suit on mars does not look like a real space suit, the guy is just using his shoes and white trousers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Enrique Barajas		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-970792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enrique Barajas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-970792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In exactly the same manner blogs enable independent creators to be read by (small) multitudes, netflix now enable independent filmmakers to reach us, regardless of profit. This movie is an Ode to Failure, or a Prayer to the Murphy´s Law. This very flick can be seen as a failure, or as an approach to the unknown. Final clues: Stanaforth´s space suit is a kid´s space suit, complete with scholar items precisely depicted like a backpack, street shoes, short pants, short sleeve shirt, and a fishbowl. That image brings tears to anyone watching slightly beyond...
Cuaron´s Roma uses that gimmick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In exactly the same manner blogs enable independent creators to be read by (small) multitudes, netflix now enable independent filmmakers to reach us, regardless of profit. This movie is an Ode to Failure, or a Prayer to the Murphy´s Law. This very flick can be seen as a failure, or as an approach to the unknown. Final clues: Stanaforth´s space suit is a kid´s space suit, complete with scholar items precisely depicted like a backpack, street shoes, short pants, short sleeve shirt, and a fishbowl. That image brings tears to anyone watching slightly beyond&#8230;<br />
Cuaron´s Roma uses that gimmick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marco		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-961663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-961663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read all the comments, and the great thing about cinema is storytelling. I can see that almost all of you agreed that he probably died in the desert and tha Mars thing never happened, well that&#039;s great! that means that you understood it, is not about to make sense or not, movies are fictional and allegories to something deeper, and finding those hidden clues just means that it was well directed, the script is awsome, beyond other movies that perhaps seek to enternain, this one tries to reach you somewhere inside. 

This movie perhaps is about a huge faileaure to an even bigger desire, that even approaching the unknow (DEATH), we want to enter it wishing that we acomplished it as our last breath on this planet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read all the comments, and the great thing about cinema is storytelling. I can see that almost all of you agreed that he probably died in the desert and tha Mars thing never happened, well that&#8217;s great! that means that you understood it, is not about to make sense or not, movies are fictional and allegories to something deeper, and finding those hidden clues just means that it was well directed, the script is awsome, beyond other movies that perhaps seek to enternain, this one tries to reach you somewhere inside. </p>
<p>This movie perhaps is about a huge faileaure to an even bigger desire, that even approaching the unknow (DEATH), we want to enter it wishing that we acomplished it as our last breath on this planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lefteria Eddy		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-944217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lefteria Eddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-944217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[String theory...in two strings he dies.
In one string he lives.
And in one he never dies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>String theory&#8230;in two strings he dies.<br />
In one string he lives.<br />
And in one he never dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryissa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934849</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryissa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-934849</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don’t know if I’m here for a bit or a long while. 

I married a guy who is not the type to waste time contemplating movies so I may have found a place to play. At least I can find some justification for my binge watching habits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know if I’m here for a bit or a long while. </p>
<p>I married a guy who is not the type to waste time contemplating movies so I may have found a place to play. At least I can find some justification for my binge watching habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-934825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934796&quot;&gt;Ryissa&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey there Ryissa,
Looks like you&#039;ve taken to the blog. Your voice looks highly familiar to me. But I&#039;ll just continue smiling like a crash test dummy over here, not knowing anything differently. 

Looks like we totally agree on this movie. It&#039;s amazing how much crap I&#039;ve gotten about this write up. People that are unwilling to think about this movie at all, and instead thrash at me instead. So, forgive me for not diving deeply into your response. But yes, your evidence, your points, all align with my larger story that this Mars thing didn&#039;t actually even happen. Can&#039;t have. Just makes zero sense. But alas... welcome (back?) to the blog Ryissa.

Taylor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934796">Ryissa</a>.</p>
<p>Hey there Ryissa,<br />
Looks like you&#8217;ve taken to the blog. Your voice looks highly familiar to me. But I&#8217;ll just continue smiling like a crash test dummy over here, not knowing anything differently. </p>
<p>Looks like we totally agree on this movie. It&#8217;s amazing how much crap I&#8217;ve gotten about this write up. People that are unwilling to think about this movie at all, and instead thrash at me instead. So, forgive me for not diving deeply into your response. But yes, your evidence, your points, all align with my larger story that this Mars thing didn&#8217;t actually even happen. Can&#8217;t have. Just makes zero sense. But alas&#8230; welcome (back?) to the blog Ryissa.</p>
<p>Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryissa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryissa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-934796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s a film that lacks adequate  tension. Visually some great moments, but eventually you lose interest in caring about what is going on. It may have been written well before the Martian, but it seems like it only made it to screen to capitalize on a suspected block buster coming out. A friend once told me a story that relies on flashbacks is the sign of a weak script. This movie only makes sense because we keep getting hammered by flashbacks to his invention blowing up in desert and injuring him. There’s no character development despite a good acting effort. Why we should care that this guy is doomed is never established. It’s not the worst piece of filmmaking, but it’s far from being notable. 

I side with the camp voting he’s in a delirium due to dehydration in the desert. 

I’m willing to let a lot of stuff that doesn’t work if you think about how real space programs do things and how space ships actually function. I’m willing to suspend disbelief on mad scientist getting to head into space after developing technology. Because simplifying things in that regard is an accepted Hollywood work around.  But then the movie keeps piling on the implausible. 

- skinny somehow gets to man mission control and be his base camp buddy. 
- he self frequently corrects his monologue changing  “this journey” to “this mission” sort of thing. 
- the ship names Zephyr (west wind, bringer of spring/fruit), Boreas (winter wind, north wind). He even says the line “Fruit from Zephyr” when he docks and talks with space station crew. This is the stuff of daydreams of space, not actual space travel. 
- the mission is named Romulus (hello founder of Rome) ... really??
- his plan “bring it [Mars] to life” which is so Dr Frankenstein.  One water reactor is going to awaken Mars. Cue lightning and thunder.  
- His pride is keeping him from making rational decisions. Why the hell did he test it in the desert alone to start with? Because he wanted to create a legend for how he did the impossible. Instead of a systematic approach he goes for broke with untested technology. 
- cut to, hurtling through space constantly fixing same technology once it breaks. For a moment in the desert he could pretend he’d be the hero of a fantastic space opera. But now his real failure is mirrored in a dream of a failing space mission with no chance of rescue. 
- the storm imagery. Egad those are visions borne out of deep space Hubble pictures (I recall before we hit that there is something about Hubble being broadcast in background) when things seem plausible-ish. Pretty sure nothing like that between here and Mars or his off course comment is the understatement of the year. 
- His speeches about solving desert dilemma. How many of us have slogged through some annoying task by pretending we’ve already done it and are being interviewed on TV? His speeches sound like the way you self talk your way through dilemma to keep yourself from giving up. 
- And let’s be clear we never see him solve original desert dilemma  The only time we see him walk out of desert triumphant is before both desert reactor and ship reactor keep failing catastrophically. After that he’s trapped in mirrored scenarios. 
- He’s dehydrated severely for how long and he walks like a champ onto the surface of Mars head and beard looking freshly shaven and all aglow?  Um, no. 
- he talks about falling and not being able to get back up in desert. Wrapping himself in the sand or some such comment. He also mentions losing feeling in his arm and leg and feeling unworldly. He clearly was screwed  and lay there contemplating his dreams. 
- maybe he ultimately gets rescued by his worried friend. Maybe he perishes. Ultimately he’s a guy dying in the desert dreaming of accomplishments well beyond his limited grasp. 

Because I’m perverse I stared till my eyes went dry. I didn’t find a rip in his suit. Something reflects off it for sure. Didn’t hear a prey bird in first or second round of wind effects during credits - only a faint whistle just before sound cuts.  Glad I didn’t as that would be too obvious even for this film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a film that lacks adequate  tension. Visually some great moments, but eventually you lose interest in caring about what is going on. It may have been written well before the Martian, but it seems like it only made it to screen to capitalize on a suspected block buster coming out. A friend once told me a story that relies on flashbacks is the sign of a weak script. This movie only makes sense because we keep getting hammered by flashbacks to his invention blowing up in desert and injuring him. There’s no character development despite a good acting effort. Why we should care that this guy is doomed is never established. It’s not the worst piece of filmmaking, but it’s far from being notable. </p>
<p>I side with the camp voting he’s in a delirium due to dehydration in the desert. </p>
<p>I’m willing to let a lot of stuff that doesn’t work if you think about how real space programs do things and how space ships actually function. I’m willing to suspend disbelief on mad scientist getting to head into space after developing technology. Because simplifying things in that regard is an accepted Hollywood work around.  But then the movie keeps piling on the implausible. </p>
<p>&#8211; skinny somehow gets to man mission control and be his base camp buddy.<br />
&#8211; he self frequently corrects his monologue changing  “this journey” to “this mission” sort of thing.<br />
&#8211; the ship names Zephyr (west wind, bringer of spring/fruit), Boreas (winter wind, north wind). He even says the line “Fruit from Zephyr” when he docks and talks with space station crew. This is the stuff of daydreams of space, not actual space travel.<br />
&#8211; the mission is named Romulus (hello founder of Rome) &#8230; really??<br />
&#8211; his plan “bring it [Mars] to life” which is so Dr Frankenstein.  One water reactor is going to awaken Mars. Cue lightning and thunder.<br />
&#8211; His pride is keeping him from making rational decisions. Why the hell did he test it in the desert alone to start with? Because he wanted to create a legend for how he did the impossible. Instead of a systematic approach he goes for broke with untested technology.<br />
&#8211; cut to, hurtling through space constantly fixing same technology once it breaks. For a moment in the desert he could pretend he’d be the hero of a fantastic space opera. But now his real failure is mirrored in a dream of a failing space mission with no chance of rescue.<br />
&#8211; the storm imagery. Egad those are visions borne out of deep space Hubble pictures (I recall before we hit that there is something about Hubble being broadcast in background) when things seem plausible-ish. Pretty sure nothing like that between here and Mars or his off course comment is the understatement of the year.<br />
&#8211; His speeches about solving desert dilemma. How many of us have slogged through some annoying task by pretending we’ve already done it and are being interviewed on TV? His speeches sound like the way you self talk your way through dilemma to keep yourself from giving up.<br />
&#8211; And let’s be clear we never see him solve original desert dilemma  The only time we see him walk out of desert triumphant is before both desert reactor and ship reactor keep failing catastrophically. After that he’s trapped in mirrored scenarios.<br />
&#8211; He’s dehydrated severely for how long and he walks like a champ onto the surface of Mars head and beard looking freshly shaven and all aglow?  Um, no.<br />
&#8211; he talks about falling and not being able to get back up in desert. Wrapping himself in the sand or some such comment. He also mentions losing feeling in his arm and leg and feeling unworldly. He clearly was screwed  and lay there contemplating his dreams.<br />
&#8211; maybe he ultimately gets rescued by his worried friend. Maybe he perishes. Ultimately he’s a guy dying in the desert dreaming of accomplishments well beyond his limited grasp. </p>
<p>Because I’m perverse I stared till my eyes went dry. I didn’t find a rip in his suit. Something reflects off it for sure. Didn’t hear a prey bird in first or second round of wind effects during credits &#8211; only a faint whistle just before sound cuts.  Glad I didn’t as that would be too obvious even for this film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fools		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2016/08/29/let-explain-approaching-unknown/#comment-934740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylorholmes.com/?p=11874#comment-934740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No matter what, I watched the movie. Not so terrible. I dont give a fuck about coms delay or not, it is a movie... Crappy review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what, I watched the movie. Not so terrible. I dont give a fuck about coms delay or not, it is a movie&#8230; Crappy review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
