<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Explaining just how Fractured the Movie Fractured May Be	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/</link>
	<description>Movies, Books &#38; TV for people who like to think..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Btw, the Machinist is one of the best films I’ve ever seen but I’ve not seen Session 9 so now I have added it to my list! But The Machinist, wow. That was Bale at his absolute best before he became known for being ornery and hard to work with. A cult classic for sure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, the Machinist is one of the best films I’ve ever seen but I’ve not seen Session 9 so now I have added it to my list! But The Machinist, wow. That was Bale at his absolute best before he became known for being ornery and hard to work with. A cult classic for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eli was umm, something else! Not sure if you finished yet but it sure didn’t go where I thought it would go. Which is in fact why I thought of you after watching it but that’s all I’ll say as I don’t know how far through the film you’ve gotten. I didn’t even like the film much but there are still points worthy of some discussion, I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli was umm, something else! Not sure if you finished yet but it sure didn’t go where I thought it would go. Which is in fact why I thought of you after watching it but that’s all I’ll say as I don’t know how far through the film you’ve gotten. I didn’t even like the film much but there are still points worthy of some discussion, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017367&quot;&gt;deKev&lt;/a&gt;.

Halfway through Eli. Dork.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017367">deKev</a>.</p>
<p>Halfway through Eli. Dork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’m not even sure it qualified as a novella, more of a short story so they had to add something to the mix or it would have been a really short film! There was a point in time when Hill’s novels first started coming out that he did not admit publicly who his father was as I believe he wanted them to stand on their own merit but as you can imagine in the internet era, that didn’t last very long. So once the cat was out of the bag, fans wanted some type of collaboration. In their newer novels they plant little Easter eggs from each other’s past work. Anyway, I’m off on a tangent now. But I don’t want to spoil the film if Taylor hasn’t watched it yet. But I will say I think the film was better than the actual story just because there was elaboration regarding certain elements. Just for me as a fan of both of their books, there are a million more Id love to see make it to film although Dr. Sleep looks interesting as the sequel to The Shining. It was an exceptional book so I have high hopes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not even sure it qualified as a novella, more of a short story so they had to add something to the mix or it would have been a really short film! There was a point in time when Hill’s novels first started coming out that he did not admit publicly who his father was as I believe he wanted them to stand on their own merit but as you can imagine in the internet era, that didn’t last very long. So once the cat was out of the bag, fans wanted some type of collaboration. In their newer novels they plant little Easter eggs from each other’s past work. Anyway, I’m off on a tangent now. But I don’t want to spoil the film if Taylor hasn’t watched it yet. But I will say I think the film was better than the actual story just because there was elaboration regarding certain elements. Just for me as a fan of both of their books, there are a million more Id love to see make it to film although Dr. Sleep looks interesting as the sequel to The Shining. It was an exceptional book so I have high hopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: deKev		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deKev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve not had the pleasure to read the novella by King and son, so I can&#039;t say for sure. But from what I could gather from some other sites that the filmmakers might have added one or two new elements to the mix. In any case, the movie is far more ambitious in scope than Fractured, maybe a little too ambitious for its own good, come to think of it. I mean [Spoiler Alert] a maze that can bend space and time at will in order to trap its victims [Spoiler Ends] should be plenty enough material for a 100-minute film, right? But that&#039;s just the tip of the iceberg really...

Anyway, I feel In The Tall Grass should offer more room for discussion than Fractured, certainly Taylor can have a field day positing theories behind the maze, maybe right after he gives Eli a once-over too, of course, again, no pressure, haha.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not had the pleasure to read the novella by King and son, so I can&#8217;t say for sure. But from what I could gather from some other sites that the filmmakers might have added one or two new elements to the mix. In any case, the movie is far more ambitious in scope than Fractured, maybe a little too ambitious for its own good, come to think of it. I mean [Spoiler Alert] a maze that can bend space and time at will in order to trap its victims [Spoiler Ends] should be plenty enough material for a 100-minute film, right? But that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg really&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I feel In The Tall Grass should offer more room for discussion than Fractured, certainly Taylor can have a field day positing theories behind the maze, maybe right after he gives Eli a once-over too, of course, again, no pressure, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PS, I don’t think this is a site where anyone is right or wrong. Even if I don’t love a film, I can find elements of it that are worthy of discussion which is why I’m guessing you posted this one here. Plus I pay little mind to IMDB ratings as my criteria differ from those that would give a high rating to a Marvel franchise movie, for instance. I did not love this film but admire the try at making something unconventional instead of just churning out another rom com or superhero film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, I don’t think this is a site where anyone is right or wrong. Even if I don’t love a film, I can find elements of it that are worthy of discussion which is why I’m guessing you posted this one here. Plus I pay little mind to IMDB ratings as my criteria differ from those that would give a high rating to a Marvel franchise movie, for instance. I did not love this film but admire the try at making something unconventional instead of just churning out another rom com or superhero film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’m really surprised they bothered to make In the Tall Grass a film as it was based on a pretty short story from Stephen King and Joe Hill. I’m also an avid reader and am currently reading The Institute by King. The film was just ok for me. I’ll wait and see what Taylor has to say before doing a deep dive so he best get on those recommendations! Just kidding!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m really surprised they bothered to make In the Tall Grass a film as it was based on a pretty short story from Stephen King and Joe Hill. I’m also an avid reader and am currently reading The Institute by King. The film was just ok for me. I’ll wait and see what Taylor has to say before doing a deep dive so he best get on those recommendations! Just kidding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor Holmes		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017344&quot;&gt;deKev&lt;/a&gt;.

The Machinist is brilliant. Reminds me very much of Nolan’s “Following” in tone. Or maybe it was “Insomnia”. Can’t remember. But I regularly get the two confused. Session 9 was a great movie as well. I watched it when it first came out and remember recommending it a lot. So yeah, I get it. 

These kinds of movies are more dependent on the viewer’s attitude and foreknowledge than anything else. So I am giving you guys the benefit... promise. I know I went in all wrong on this one. And generally speaking, I only post about movies that are good. I only talk about movies that I liked. And I posted about this one because I knew many might like it regardless of the fact that I wasn’t a huge fan. 

Thanks for clarifying DeKev. But it’s all good. Everything is fine. I just blame your for all my life’s troubles is all. Haha. Seriously though, did you just recommend not 1, not 2, but 3 movies I should review in a single comment? In 3 minutes of typing you pour on like 6 hours of movie watching and 10 hours of research and typing?!? Unbelievable. You could have just let your comment go, allow the post response hate grow and id have been all the better for it! Hahaha. 

Why don’t you give me a session 9 post to put up for you?!? Hahaha. And a Machinist? Oh, and after that a tall grass review? Did you not like The Tall Grass? Is it any good?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017344">deKev</a>.</p>
<p>The Machinist is brilliant. Reminds me very much of Nolan’s “Following” in tone. Or maybe it was “Insomnia”. Can’t remember. But I regularly get the two confused. Session 9 was a great movie as well. I watched it when it first came out and remember recommending it a lot. So yeah, I get it. </p>
<p>These kinds of movies are more dependent on the viewer’s attitude and foreknowledge than anything else. So I am giving you guys the benefit&#8230; promise. I know I went in all wrong on this one. And generally speaking, I only post about movies that are good. I only talk about movies that I liked. And I posted about this one because I knew many might like it regardless of the fact that I wasn’t a huge fan. </p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying DeKev. But it’s all good. Everything is fine. I just blame your for all my life’s troubles is all. Haha. Seriously though, did you just recommend not 1, not 2, but 3 movies I should review in a single comment? In 3 minutes of typing you pour on like 6 hours of movie watching and 10 hours of research and typing?!? Unbelievable. You could have just let your comment go, allow the post response hate grow and id have been all the better for it! Hahaha. </p>
<p>Why don’t you give me a session 9 post to put up for you?!? Hahaha. And a Machinist? Oh, and after that a tall grass review? Did you not like The Tall Grass? Is it any good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: deKev		</title>
		<link>https://taylorholmes.com/2019/10/19/explaining-just-how-fractured-the-movie-fractured-may-be/#comment-1017344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deKev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taylorholmes.com/?p=20070#comment-1017344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oops, having started the &quot;I Liked It&quot; Club somewhat unwittingly, now I feel like I have to admit that I did not even like the movie that much to begin with... haha, how&#039;s that for a mind-jobby twist? Kidding aside, let me reiterate what I said in my initial post that the suspense part of the movie is as good as it gets for me, at least up until the reveal is out in the open, not to mention an ending that leaves no room for doubt whatsoever, like what Lisa said. Probably no fault of the filmmakers here, suspense movies often work out like that. So long as there are enough red herrings or twists or reversals along the way to prolong the ambiguity, like what Gwen said, I&#039;m game.

But having seen a bit of the trailer, and with a dead giveaway title like what you said, I went in with low expectations, certainly lower expectations than what I had for the other new Netflix release at around the same time, In The Tall Grass (a review, pretty please?). But it was Worthington&#039;s performance (right before he went a bit berserk near the end anyway) that did the trick for me and kinda heightened my hopes a bit that had me thinking, hey this thing might turn out to be rather watchable after all. I know Sam&#039;s acting is a bit of a bone of contention here. Just because I have seen a few movies in my lifetime does not qualify me as a proper critic, unless it was egregiously bad acting, which even I would be able to recognize for sure, something I&#039;d like to believe is not the case here. And having read some other reviews online, guess what, Worthington&#039;s performance has been described from being flat to passable to career-best (this from a reviewer whose last movie that they watched Worthington in was Avatar, I kid you not). 

Enough about Sam Worthington, what about the director? He started his career with a one-two punch of Session 9 and The Machinist, two mind-blowing classics that properly announced his arrival, which IMO are still by far his career-best efforts. So if you have the time, you know what to do, but no pressure, no pressure. :p]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, having started the &#8220;I Liked It&#8221; Club somewhat unwittingly, now I feel like I have to admit that I did not even like the movie that much to begin with&#8230; haha, how&#8217;s that for a mind-jobby twist? Kidding aside, let me reiterate what I said in my initial post that the suspense part of the movie is as good as it gets for me, at least up until the reveal is out in the open, not to mention an ending that leaves no room for doubt whatsoever, like what Lisa said. Probably no fault of the filmmakers here, suspense movies often work out like that. So long as there are enough red herrings or twists or reversals along the way to prolong the ambiguity, like what Gwen said, I&#8217;m game.</p>
<p>But having seen a bit of the trailer, and with a dead giveaway title like what you said, I went in with low expectations, certainly lower expectations than what I had for the other new Netflix release at around the same time, In The Tall Grass (a review, pretty please?). But it was Worthington&#8217;s performance (right before he went a bit berserk near the end anyway) that did the trick for me and kinda heightened my hopes a bit that had me thinking, hey this thing might turn out to be rather watchable after all. I know Sam&#8217;s acting is a bit of a bone of contention here. Just because I have seen a few movies in my lifetime does not qualify me as a proper critic, unless it was egregiously bad acting, which even I would be able to recognize for sure, something I&#8217;d like to believe is not the case here. And having read some other reviews online, guess what, Worthington&#8217;s performance has been described from being flat to passable to career-best (this from a reviewer whose last movie that they watched Worthington in was Avatar, I kid you not). </p>
<p>Enough about Sam Worthington, what about the director? He started his career with a one-two punch of Session 9 and The Machinist, two mind-blowing classics that properly announced his arrival, which IMO are still by far his career-best efforts. So if you have the time, you know what to do, but no pressure, no pressure. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
